[vannrox]

BUSH IS NOT BACKING SPECTER.

IF HE WAS, THEN YOU CAN BE ASSURED, THAT BUSH WOULD BE VOCAL ABOUT IT.

IN THE PAST ELECTION OF 2002, BUSH SUPPORTED SPECTER SO THAT HE WOULD GET A BETTER CHANCE OF BEING REELLECTED IN PENNSYLVANIA.THIS WAS A DECISION MADE NOT BY BUSH, BUT RATHER BY CARL ROVE AND OTHER POLITICAL STRATEGISTS. THIS IS THE POST 2004 ELECTION PERIOD. THE ISSUES ARE TOO LARGE, AND THE RISKS TOO GREAT...TO LEAVE THE DECISIONS TO BE MADE BY POLITICAL HANDLERS.



PRESIDENT BUSES SILENCE ON THIS MATTER...
SPEAKS VOLUMES CONCERNING HIS THOUGHTS.

[Henchman]

If BUSH were backing Specter, "... BUSH WOULD BE VOCAL ABOUT IT". Wrong! Bush is silent on deposing Specter, Bush was criticized by Ann Coulter for not being more vocal during the campaign, which she (and I) believe would have been a landslide of greater magnitude, and Bush was "like a deer in the headlights" during the first and other portions of the Presidential Debates. He is too quiet on a lot of things. He needs to take a stand, we are and we will! 2006 is around the corner, we can be REAL selective on whom we vote for, or not vote for.