Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leader of the dem lawyers says there's no fraud. Can someone please show this to the DUmmies?
Boston Globe ^ | MachineMan

Posted on 11/11/2004 8:13:38 AM PST by MachineMan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
With the leader of the democrats' legal team saying this, how can some democrats, (specially in a certain message board) still claim there was fraud?
1 posted on 11/11/2004 8:13:39 AM PST by MachineMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

I disagree- I think there was plenty of DEMOCRAP fraud- just not enough (for them) ;)


2 posted on 11/11/2004 8:14:53 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

Why confuse them with facts.


3 posted on 11/11/2004 8:15:13 AM PST by OSHA (George W Bush - 59,054,087 <----- That's ME (The dumb one on the end!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

The dems are not influenced by facts.


4 posted on 11/11/2004 8:16:04 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th% (Bush wins!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

Yes, but he is a deep plant by Karl Rove.


5 posted on 11/11/2004 8:17:28 AM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan
This is good.

It means that the DNC leadership, which wants to win elections, is being completely ignored by the activist base of the party.

That is sweet.

6 posted on 11/11/2004 8:17:37 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan
With the leader of the democrats' legal team saying this, how can some democrats still claim there was fraud?

They are going through the 5 stages of grief... Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance. Given the history of the 2000 election, I don't know if they will get past anger before 2008.

7 posted on 11/11/2004 8:18:27 AM PST by DrDavid (Tomorrow will be an even better day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

You'd think they'd listen to their own legal team. Oh well, I hope they get to read that article though, I want to see what they think, since that leaves them 3 options:

1) The democratic party is incompetent.
2) The democratic party lost of purpose.

Or... could it be...

3) Bush actually won! Nah, they'll never believe that since according to them you have to be an idiot to vote for Bush...


8 posted on 11/11/2004 8:18:42 AM PST by MachineMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

I say let 'em burn up all their energy for the next couple of years trying to prove the election was fraudulent. It's kind of like putting an idiot in a round room and telling them to find the corner - it keeps them busy on a silly project, but keeps them from doing any real damage.

Let the lunatict left have their conspiracy theories, I say encourage them!


9 posted on 11/11/2004 8:19:53 AM PST by GaltMeister (Can I get me a terrorist huntin' license in hea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

They're simply lulling us to sleep while they steal the election. NOT! Actually the democratic lawyers are looking for new employers and the Republican Party is the only one available at the present time.


10 posted on 11/11/2004 8:20:18 AM PST by riverbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

I'm sure that Walter Cronkite, "the most trusted man in America", will soon report that Karl Rove put him up to it.


11 posted on 11/11/2004 8:21:02 AM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan
...how can some democrats, (specially in a certain message board) still claim there was fraud?

It is what they do...

12 posted on 11/11/2004 8:22:00 AM PST by aliquis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

``Can someone please show this to the DUmmies?``

Oh don't do that. It looks like they are enjoying themselves so much. And like a zoo, it is fun for normal people to go over there and look at them. But please do not feed.


13 posted on 11/11/2004 8:23:58 AM PST by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

If Dem management is telling the tinhats to stand down,
it's likely due to what a real investigation would uncover.

Otherwise, they'd be happy to encourage 4 more years of
Gore-y resentment and "stolen election" spin.


14 posted on 11/11/2004 8:24:17 AM PST by Boundless (Don't despair Dems, electile disfunction is treatable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

A quick concession on their part leads me to believe that they don't want people looking into this too closely.


15 posted on 11/11/2004 8:29:09 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

Why let a little thing like lack of evidence deflate their paranoia and lunacy? I'd kind of enjoy watching their toboggan-ride into the twilight zone for a few more weeks until they return to their padded cells.


16 posted on 11/11/2004 8:30:22 AM PST by Larry381 (Our long national nightmare is over-Kerry lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

I guess you all deserve the fun of watching the DUers make their topics, but still, I wonder how these people justify their theories as well as support for a party that flat out tells them they're wrong.


17 posted on 11/11/2004 8:31:15 AM PST by MachineMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MachineMan

For crying out loud. Kerry conceded a week ago. Bill Clinton told Democrats to just accept the fact that Bush has won. And now Democrat lawyers are saying there was no fraud.

Is there something the DU retards know that Kerry, Clinton, and the head leaders of the Democrats don't?


18 posted on 11/11/2004 8:33:29 AM PST by Nascardude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOGEY

No, the real Jack Corrigan has been captured by Ashcroft's secret police. He's being held in Guantanamo all plastered up with sensors so Rove can release a film of his digital proxy saying the election was fair. The NSA is doing realtime rendering on their trillion dollar supercomputers.

Pass it on.


19 posted on 11/11/2004 8:35:13 AM PST by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
damn straight... edwards is a lawyer, skerry is a lawyer AND prosecutor and they both learned the first rule of law many years ago: you never, EVER ask a question that you don;t already know the answer to!!! they know it'd mean trouble...
20 posted on 11/11/2004 8:35:43 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson