You are simply wrong here, Narby. Evolution is a theory. Pointing that out is not religion, it's the truth. Science should deal with truth claims scientifically. Rather than admit that evolution is a theory, they run to court to silence the truth rather than support their supposed fact. A bit strange, to be sure. Scientific? Most certainly not.
Anyone who claims evolution is a fact also admits one of two things: He is incapabable of reason or he refuses to reason. Being admittedly unreasonable, therefore, he has relegated himself to the realm of non-reason. |
I believe you've purposely ignored the earlier posts on the difference between scientific "theory" and "law" because you cannot answer them.
I won't restate that case here. You've proven where you're coming from.