Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norman Bates

I hate to say this, but I don't see any reason why Hillary! would not be re-elected, not at this point. She's been admirably innocuous so far.

I'd say "no" to Sean, and I'm sure he's not inclined to give up the money and the power/the power and the money as of yet.

Could Pataki get the job done? Maybe.

Would Rudy want to? I don't know. My guess is Rudy probably thinks he could be pres (which he certainly could). The thing for him is: which is going to be the bigger issue in '08, terrorism (Rudy wins!) or social issues (Rudy loses). That's how I see it.

Who to run against Hillary! Good question. My vote, right now, is for ANYBODY BUT KEYES!

Maybe we could draft Ditka?


35 posted on 11/10/2004 6:28:24 PM PST by jocon307 (Maintain the mandate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307

You don't think Rudy could beat Hillary??


39 posted on 11/10/2004 6:33:00 PM PST by Norman Bates (Game over. Bush wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

Probably Pataki. Rudy is holding out for the "BIG" job.


186 posted on 11/12/2004 10:01:34 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson