Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Congress is the Legislative Branch of the Federal Government. The establishment of religion is a reference to national religion and clearly free exercise includes public expression, which the founding fathers themselves expressed.

The Founding Fathers and Deism

Republic v. Democracy

The Myth Behind "Separation of Church and State"

America: Our Christian Heritage, Our History and Faith in God

1 posted on 11/10/2004 3:00:51 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Coulter Fan
President Bush knocked down the wall. He sent a letter to a Baptist minister in Danbury, Ct explaining that a Presidents privat letter to a minister could not be used to set precedent for a "wall" by a mindless Supreme Court.

Easy come, easy go.

2 posted on 11/10/2004 3:05:08 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

3 posted on 11/10/2004 3:08:04 PM PST by Zacs Mom ("In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe; bmorrishome; MississippiMan; all4one; Choose Ye This Day; The_Eaglet; ...

Bump!


4 posted on 11/10/2004 3:08:06 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan (BURN IN HELL, MICHAEL MOORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Thanks for the historically accurate, if somewhat esoteric, post on the widely misunderstood notions about "separation of church and state". The current problem with respect to the establishment clause is that the radical secularists, nihilists really, seek to "establish" their belief in "no God", a nullity, as the state religion. For them, it is not enough to prevent collusion or preference by any one denomination and the government. They insist on elevating their own belief, their deity if you will, in the form of a big zero, a nothing. By this ruse, a logical fallacy, they establish a nullity as the preferred entity. Belief in nothing must reign supreme. The only acceptable spiritual position then becomes a self-absorbed, navel gazing paen to the temporal and secular.


6 posted on 11/10/2004 3:19:09 PM PST by CharlesThe Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

This is an awesome Post! I love that "they" quote the "wall of separation," phrase that is NO WHERE in our legal founding documents...


8 posted on 11/10/2004 3:27:09 PM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
The establishment clause referred only to making one particular denomination of Christianity (Anglican or Congregationalist predominantly) the official state church of a government. It does not authorize promoting secular humanism or anti-Christianity as the official ideology of the government or of American society.

Prayer in Congress, prayer and Bible studies in schools were accepted and were a normal part of American culture. Totalitarian secular humanism is a misinterpretation of what the establishment clause was about. And a pretty stupid misinterpretation. Jefferson's "wall of separation" metaphor reflects his own opinion and is not in the U.S. Constitution. It has no legal status or force of law.

10 posted on 11/10/2004 3:42:18 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

We need to replace "Separation of Church and State" with a more accurate phrase. I suggest "Non-establishment of Religion."


18 posted on 11/10/2004 5:23:23 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Look it up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

bttt


21 posted on 06/28/2005 8:37:40 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Additional support for Barton's interpretation of "separation of church and state" would be the establishment or attempt to establish a statewide religion by a governor or a state legislature. Do you know if there is any such evidence? I don't know where to begin to look.


22 posted on 07/20/2005 4:59:22 PM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

I did a search on "state religion" in Wikipedea and found that numerous states had establihed state religions including Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_religion


23 posted on 07/20/2005 10:20:24 PM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson