To: Poohbah
My first post to you on this subject posited that an acquittal, if made expensive enough, can still be used to create a disincentive to hire illegals. Thus, even if your juries that must be out there somewhere (I trust you have evidence other than your bare assertion) do not convict, it is not the case that nothing has been accomplished. The business has incurred a new cost and there is negative publicity about their business practices.
To: radicalamericannationalist
My first post to you on this subject posited that an acquittal, if made expensive enough, can still be used to create a disincentive to hire illegals.Ah. I see now. You wish to replicate Janet Reno's strategy against firearms ownership: if you harrass enough people, then they will surrender their guns more readily.
Empowering government to engage in pure harrassment is a pretty stupid idea, OK?
Thus, even if your juries that must be out there somewhere (I trust you have evidence other than your bare assertion) do not convict, it is not the case that nothing has been accomplished.
Look in newspapers from 1987-88. Most probably would not devote extensive coverage to cases ending in acquittal, but there ought to be a column-inch or so reporting the fact.
624 posted on
11/10/2004 7:01:14 PM PST by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: radicalamericannationalist
Pres. Bush did talk about it in the last debate. I re-read it today
625 posted on
11/10/2004 7:02:00 PM PST by
marilew
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson