Can someone explain the nature of all the attention on the previous juror who was removed? Why is his opinion being asked by all the talking heads?
I don't know why. I think his IQ is below college level. He is a creepy dude, IMO. I think the pundits, or maybe he is now a shill for the defense team, to keep the word out that the DA didn't do a good job and being paid for it??? JUST MY THOUGHTS!!!
Because as everyone knows, out here in fly-over country (the part of the map that is colored in red) we are dumber than a box of rocks and we'll believe that someone who spent six weeks on a jury is a bonified legal expert.
I haven't a clue..
It is beyond me why the talk shows even consider the opinion of anyone with his limited IQ and deep prejudices. Except perhaps to turn it into a freak show while they giggle about him behind his back.
That's what we would all like to know. I don't understand why this DISGRACED former Juror's opinion is even sought after. I am beginning to have a visceral disgust for California Juris Prudence. It's insanity. The insane are in charge of the asylum if you ask me.