Posted on 11/10/2004 5:27:02 AM PST by Happy2BMe
Pat Buchanan is a religious leader?
________________________________________
Alen Spectacle wouldn't know a 'Christian Leader' if Jesus Christ himself walked up to him and personally introduced Himself.
The truth is that Specter is merely one of dozens just like him in the Senate. Why the voters elect them is beyond me.
This is not Christian against Specter. It is strict constructionist against liberal prenumbra finding activist
power hungry socialists.
"I don't think the Republican Party should be blackmailed by any special interest group."
Pro-choice is NOT a special interest group?
We need to re-name this to what it really is.
Pro-Death verses Pro-Life.
That kinda clears it up for the fence morons that just don't get it.
I think sometimes, Falwell and Robertson are way to extreme for my tastes. In fact I do usually turn the TV to another channel when they come one now. So I think I would have to be in Specter's corner on that.
I really don't know Mr. Reed all that well other than to say I think he does give a good interview and he is a good campaigner in the south states like Georgia. I have never thought of Pat Buchanan as a religious leader. I disagree with Pat's point on protectionism and running against Bush43 but I have respected the man over the years.
It will be interesting to see what the Senate does in this case. Personally, I don't mind Specter and his views on most issues. He doesn't seem to slam the president the way McCain does. He has similar views as Rudy (who seems quite popular on this db) and, quite frankly, a lot of Specter's views are mine too. Obviously many on this board do not like him for his moderate approaches so it will be interesting to watch Capital Hill over the next while.
The rest is rhetoric.
Good grief, only a liberal idiot would call life in the womb a special interest group
Recall that alleged Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, upon winning the primary, immediately backstabbed President Bush, who had campaigned for him instead of actual Republican Pat Toomey. Turns out Specter was just getting started.
We now see that the usually pro-Democrat Pittsburgh Post-Gazette endorsed the sharp-horned RINO in Tuesday's general election for this reason: "Before the Post-Gazette editorial board, he promised that no extremists would be approved for the bench."
What the pro-abortion Specter and pro-abortion Post-Gazette mean by "extremist" is anyone who isn't pro-abortion or who otherwise follows the U.S. Constitution instead of making up legislation from the bench.
"Even if he votes nine out of 10 times for the administration, we trust his word that the 10 percent of difference will be a brake on the worst excesses of a second Bush term, if it comes to that," the pee-yoo P-G snarled.
And there are these facts:
Arlen Specter:
Voted NO on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
Voted NO on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
Success is near because of all the hard work we have done, but it is not yet over. The Philadelphia Inquirer, Washington Times, and United Press International all covered how the offices have been flooded with calls, but we need to keep it up as the fight does not end here! Make the calls all over again on Monday.
Also note the changes to the site, all the recent press mentions will be on the Why? page, but this blog should keep you fairly up to date on the goings ons.
Mark Harris .:. 11/6/2004 Keep Up The Work
Things are going fantastic over here, as we have gotten press through the Laura Ingram Show, several state pro-life alerts, and countless conservative e-mail lists, but the fight has just begun.
The rumor on the Hill is that things are about ready to break. We just need to keep up pressure on them to make sure it happens. So keep your eyes and ears open. NotSpecter.com also has some great resources that have gone up so make sure to check it out.
Also GrassrootsPA.com has a letter written by Specter to raise money that slams the conservative wing of the party, which puts to rest any argument over how he would run the Judiciary Committee.
http://stopspecter.savethegop.com/
Lest you think this is fiction - these signs started to appear in the Philadelphia area just before the election, paid for by Arlens former campaign manager. This particular picture originially appeared in the Philly Daily News.
Would you consider killing an unborn child a "moderate approach"?
GRASSROOTSPA CALL TO ACTION
STOP SPECTER FROM BLOCKING BUSH'S JUDGES
Contact Senator Frist
202-224-3135
Contact Senator Santorum
202-224-6324
Tell them in no uncertain terms that Specter cannot be made Senate Judiciary Chairman
Do NOT take "no" for an answer!
Bush has no Mandate?
Just say "NO" To Specter's Games!
Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Members
Contact Senator Orrin Hatch
202-224-5251
Contact Senator Charles Grassley
202-224-3744
Contact Senator Jon Kyl
202-224-4521
Contact Senator Mike DeWine
202-224-2315
Contact Senator Jeff Sessions
202-224-4124
Contact Senator Lindsey Graham
202-224-5972
Contact Senator Larry Craig
202-224-2752
Contact Senator Saxby Chambliss
202-224-3521
Contact Senator John Cornyn
202-224-2934
Take care.
Thanks, I posted that list on my blog!
So then you think killing the unborn is "moderate". I'm sorry, but I killing our most innocent citizens is not something I find easy to pass off as a "disagreement".
I refuse to support the culture of death, but if you think it's ok to tear children's limbs apart, then apparently you do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.