Until political correctness took hold, homosexuality was on the list of known psychological disturances. That was changed by Dr John Money at Johns Hopkins few years back....no doubt after rigorous lobbying.
One of the most unnerving disturbances is that homosesuals have savage sexual appetites---something on the order of the Marquis de Sade----- that constantly need sating.
That is why they take big risks to keep sexual partners closeby to sate their cravings---as the NJ gay gov did---- and why they should not be in position of public trust.
RINO ping
Good points. This year I have read several of Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson's books exposing the genesis of the psychological profession. One of the most enlightening was THE ASSAULT ON TRUTH which exposes Freud's coverup of the vast tragedy of child molestation which was going on in that day. Women and children suffered immensely at the hands of known perverts in the profession. Freud was not among them but he ended up covering up for them because they would blackball and ruin the practice of anyone who dared to disagree with their tight control on the profession and it's rules. Many people in this work today are good people but they know that a good bit of the theory is nuts to say the least and some of the more ridiculous in their ranks have attempted to "normalize" the most perverted practices, including sex with little children. Society, in order to survive, has always judged extreme behavorial aberation, not to unjustly punish people, but to protect the majority against behavior which is hurtful, aggressive, destructive or forced upon people not wanting to practice it. I think in this last election people have, at last, gotten the opportunity to respond to a homosexual agenda they are not prepared to tolerate at this time.