To: Michael_Michaelangelo; Carling
209 posted on
11/09/2004 6:00:05 PM PST by
ThinkPlease
(Fortune Favors the Bold!)
To: ThinkPlease
Herewith, my review of the response to a critique of 29 evidences:
It's tough slogging. The guy should simply have rewritten the original essay. He could have used Darwin's technique at various points and said something like: "Those who dispute this point by arguing X are in error because ..."
210 posted on
11/09/2004 6:38:16 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: ThinkPlease
Thanks for the link.
Since you're such a big TO fan, here's a critique of Boxhorn's 'Observed Instances of Speciation' you might be interested in: No speciation
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson