And the evidence against it is generally discarded, even by proponents. I again use the "it used its wings as a net to trap bugs" explanation of how birds first flew. Once it was disproven (mostly by an aerospace engineer) the proponents said "Oh, well, the theory served its purpose."
I think you have entered the world of 'random thoughts'. I have no idea of what you are trying to say.
168 posted on 11/09/2004 2:28:35 PM PST by WildTurkey
Some say that TOE excludes ID in any form or fashion and say it depends only on 'random acts of chance' inorder to make a false argument against the TOE.
If you have a peer-reviewed article that states otherwise, Id like to see it