Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dartuser
And the evidence against it is generally discarded, even by proponents. I again use the "it used its wings as a net to trap bugs" explanation of how birds first flew. Once it was disproven (mostly by an aerospace engineer) the proponents said "Oh, well, the theory served its purpose."

I think you have entered the world of 'random thoughts'. I have no idea of what you are trying to say.

168 posted on 11/09/2004 2:28:35 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: WildTurkey
Some say that TOE excludes ID in any form or fashion and say it depends only on 'random acts of chance' inorder to make a false argument against the TOE.

If you have a peer-reviewed article that states otherwise, I’d like to see it…

187 posted on 11/09/2004 2:56:24 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson