> In effect, you say that anything agrees with you is good.
Sigh. How exactly do you come to that astonishingly incorrect assessment?
> I routinely beg to be pursuaded and get tripe like this.
In other words, you refuse to be persuaded by the facts. i can't help you, then.
I asked you if you agreed there could be a bad "pro" evolution article and the only answer you've been able to envision is a Lamarkian "evolution" article. Improve on that answer or count yourself among them with small minds. Your call.