Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leapfrog

I wonder if that same druggist sells condoms and Viagra????


4 posted on 11/09/2004 8:27:28 AM PST by buffyt (America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. Pres. George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: buffyt

Well, condoms are not prescribed, so it wouldn't work!


28 posted on 11/09/2004 8:37:17 AM PST by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
I wonder if that same druggist sells condoms and Viagra????

Yeah, right...unless it's the pharmacist's private company, they should do as the owners tell them, or they can find a new job. And it would be completely contradictory standing there telling your customer you won't issue them birth-control pills while on the public side of the counter is 100 boxes of Trojans. If you are going to go that far then you better go the distance otherwise you end up looking like an idiot.
36 posted on 11/09/2004 8:39:04 AM PST by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt
I wonder if that same druggist sells condoms and Viagra????

Irrelevant. The issue does not concern sex, and is unlikely to concern birth control generally.

The specific problem is that the pill is an abortafacient (I probably misspelled that). This means that the pill does not prevent conception, but prevents the fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. If one holds the position that life begins at conception then there is little logical difference between this and abortion.

Indecently, the article is wrong about RU486 concerning a similar issue. RU486 does not prevent fertilization, it causes the expulsion of the fertilized egg even if it has already attached. Again, the destruction of life.

I agree that the woman should have been given back her script, but I disagree that pharmacists should be forced to choose between keeping their jobs and abiding by their morals.

I am also rather surprised that so many here are presumably aligned with John Kerry on this. Unrestricted fetal stem cell research is opposed by President Bush because fertilized eggs (people) will be destroyed in the process. One can argue all day as to when life begins, but if the instant is unknown then should we not support the safest course?

275 posted on 11/09/2004 10:37:06 AM PST by 70times7 (An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: buffyt

Whoa now. I agree as well, but come on this is the liberal media were talking about. Lets not all jump to conclusions and think that this is widespread. Remember everything the media or liberals say should be taken with a grain of salt. We know they are liars - one isolated occurrance is not evidence.


441 posted on 11/09/2004 12:40:25 PM PST by sasafras (sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson