I wonder if that same druggist sells condoms and Viagra????
Well, condoms are not prescribed, so it wouldn't work!
Irrelevant. The issue does not concern sex, and is unlikely to concern birth control generally.
The specific problem is that the pill is an abortafacient (I probably misspelled that). This means that the pill does not prevent conception, but prevents the fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. If one holds the position that life begins at conception then there is little logical difference between this and abortion.
Indecently, the article is wrong about RU486 concerning a similar issue. RU486 does not prevent fertilization, it causes the expulsion of the fertilized egg even if it has already attached. Again, the destruction of life.
I agree that the woman should have been given back her script, but I disagree that pharmacists should be forced to choose between keeping their jobs and abiding by their morals.
I am also rather surprised that so many here are presumably aligned with John Kerry on this. Unrestricted fetal stem cell research is opposed by President Bush because fertilized eggs (people) will be destroyed in the process. One can argue all day as to when life begins, but if the instant is unknown then should we not support the safest course?
Whoa now. I agree as well, but come on this is the liberal media were talking about. Lets not all jump to conclusions and think that this is widespread. Remember everything the media or liberals say should be taken with a grain of salt. We know they are liars - one isolated occurrance is not evidence.