Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
No his vote was not needed, the filibusters succeeded without him. i don't know how you could not be aware of that.

Your post makes absolutely no sense. The filibuster is what killed getting our judges confirmed. We needed every vote we could muster. It would have been in Chafee's political interest to vote FOR the filibuster, not AGAINST it. Chafee voted with the president on his judicial nominees, and we continue to need his help on getting to 60 votes.

48 posted on 11/09/2004 7:41:26 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: mwl1
Chaffee did not have to vote against the filibuster- it succeeded anyway.

If you can't get past your bizarre fantasy that his vote made a difference I give up on you.

Now that his vote on a filibuster will matter he's on the spot and he needs cover to protect him from a pro-abortion opponent.

End the filibuster and he can vote against all the pro-life judge he want and they'll be approved anyway- and he won't be blamed.

55 posted on 11/09/2004 7:49:49 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice.. NOT Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson