Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paper Ballots in Legal Tangle (NM, "perceived" fraud?)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | November 9, 2004 | David Miles and Rene Romo

Posted on 11/09/2004 6:58:35 AM PST by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
A long read, but it brings folks up to date here in NM.

As of this morning at the time of posting, President Bush leads by 8,273 votes (still have those two missing precincts out there!). The most up to date results can be found below. I caution going to the NM SOS office because their results fluctuate (votes posted, lost and posted again as they update counties).

New Mexico Election Results (ABQJournal/AP)

1 posted on 11/09/2004 6:58:36 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Flashbacks of FReepers storming the star chamber.


2 posted on 11/09/2004 7:05:39 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Now that you are engaged in the political process, stay engaged!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

When I went to the site you linked there was an ad at the bottom for Kerry bumper stickers and t-shirts. Isn't that a government site? And if so I wonder how they can heve an ad for either candidate.


3 posted on 11/09/2004 7:06:49 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Does any of this give us a clue as to what happened on election night when 28,000 unanswered Kerry votes materialized out of thin air just as the networks were about to call the state seeing there was a 30,000 vote lead for Bush with 99% of the vote counted?


4 posted on 11/09/2004 7:07:17 AM PST by Danno (the Dems have poop in their pants...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwatTeam

The link takes you to a newspaper, The Albuquerque Journal.


5 posted on 11/09/2004 7:09:54 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Now that you are engaged in the political process, stay engaged!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Danno

That's the way the democrat machine operates. During 2000 the President had won NM by about 200 votes and some precinct "found" 500 votes for Gore that had been entered incorrectly. Of course, by then the Florida fiasco was in full uproar and it was allowed to stand. I think Algore won NM by about 300 votes. If I'm am wrong about this someone from NM please post a correction.


6 posted on 11/09/2004 7:11:36 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

OOPS My coffee hasn't kicked in yet and I had narrow vision and missed that it was a paper instead of the official site. I stand corrected and I apologize.


7 posted on 11/09/2004 7:13:04 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I am suspicious.

Can't specifically claim fraud, but the situation doesn't pass the "smell test" ....

Democrats counting and sorting ballots (by hand) AND SELECTING WHICH BALLOTS ARE TO BE COUNTED without observation by honest (republican) observers IS fraud.


8 posted on 11/09/2004 7:16:58 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
The results thus far must stick in Richardson's craw. I wouldn't put it past him to "find" just enough votes to give NM to Kerry, just to spite Bush and the Republicans. Richardson is a Clinton political hack from 'way back and well-schooled in the arts of fraud and deceit.

Well, they aren't going to get away with that crap in OH. In spite of Bob Taft's weakness, Ken Blackwell (SoS) won't put up with any nonsense. And the sentries on the ground here won't let them, either.

9 posted on 11/09/2004 7:17:25 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera

My gut feeling is that Richardson probably doesn't want to follow through with a full scale fraud this time and give his state to Bush, because it doesn't matter. And if this does happen, there will be even more of an outcry for an investigation into New Mexico voter fraud, and voter fraud nationally. This works against having the same corrupt system in place for Hillary and future Dems. After all, the Republicans didn't press for changes after 2000, and we all were sweating out voter fraud in 2004 as a result.


10 posted on 11/09/2004 7:24:19 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
About a third were disqualified for a variety of reasons but mainly because the voter was not registered or they lacked the proper signatures.

I'd really like to know which candidate was chosen on those disqualified ballots. I think We The People have a right to know.

11 posted on 11/09/2004 7:26:35 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

True that it doesn't matter in the overall decision if Richardson flips NM to Kerry. That's why I say if he does it at all it will just be for spite, plus a personal satisfaction of "delivering" (fraud and all) "his" state to Kerry.


12 posted on 11/09/2004 7:30:04 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

I saw the lady in charge of the DONA ANA vote counting on the News last night.....LET me just say...VOTER FRAUD GALORE! A very dishonest WITCH! She is the one who booted the pubs out because they were disturbing those that were counting the votes....HMMMMMMM why were they up in arms, WERE they seeing something fishy going on?! If the outcome turns to sKerry, I hope the pubs will take it to court! OBTW, the DONA ANA witch said that by today they should have a verified count! Keep your eyes open!


13 posted on 11/09/2004 7:31:09 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

More info on the provisional ballot issue on the NM local board, here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/profiles?location=79


14 posted on 11/09/2004 7:35:58 AM PST by CedarDave (Remember November 2, 2004 -- May it always be known as Vietnam Veterans Victory Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

this smells of coverup. the fraud probably happened on election day. They're probably shredding the evidence.


15 posted on 11/09/2004 7:37:25 AM PST by wolfman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I think it does still matter. If they can give the state to Kerry, it will make Bush's victory look smaller and more questionable. They would of course, say that the state was taken from Bush and given to Kerry because of Republican election fraud.

Also a kerry victory would make Richardson look better, and help him be a power broker, if not a candidate, in 2008.


16 posted on 11/09/2004 7:42:03 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I was supposed to be at the Dona Ana courthouse today to serve as a republican watcher as they canvassed the provisional ballots, but I was told nevermind, they are still in a meeting to determine if watchers are legal. SOS Vigil is pulling out all the legal stops to hand this state to Kerry.


17 posted on 11/09/2004 8:20:08 AM PST by rarenmrepublican (NM - the new Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rarenmrepublican

So they don't believe in an open ballot count. Stalin tactics.


18 posted on 11/09/2004 8:24:08 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rarenmrepublican
I was supposed to be at the Dona Ana courthouse today . . .

Thank you for fighting on the frontlines for us disabled Pubbies who can only cheer you and the Republican troops on. It's a nice feeling knowing folks like you are looking after our interests.

19 posted on 11/09/2004 8:39:19 AM PST by geedee (What this country needs are more unemployed politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Just for information: I think the missing precincts in those two counties are the absentee ballots. From the site you get the * note at the bottom * Total number of precincts includes one for each precinct plus one for absentee votes. I don't know that the absentee have not been counted, nor that the provisional ballots go into that absentee number?
20 posted on 11/09/2004 8:56:25 AM PST by Ruth C (learn to analyze rationally and extrapolate consequences ... you might become a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson