Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grim
the policy could expose the university to litigation by straight employees...

Bingo.

You can have that case. I want to find a person who claims to be a polygamist who wants benefits for two partners. That would be a stronger case.

41 posted on 11/09/2004 9:46:35 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

Yep, if the criteria is benefits for those who cannot legally marry, then they have to accept polygamist domestic partners, underage domestic partners, animal domestic partners, 1st cousin domestic partners, and any other partner. It is also most likely illegal to exclude those who choose not to get married. It's their right to choose and not be discriminated against.


42 posted on 11/09/2004 10:31:44 AM PST by Rad_J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson