There is no doubt that many studies, possibly this one as well, result in worthwhile information for someone.
Indeed, most of the "youth and religion" studies are funded in part by neo-con foundations. Many of the researchers involved in groups like the "Ethics and Public Policy Center" end up working as Republican policy analysts.
This is not a question of the value of the information: but rather, does the government belong in the research business at all?
If we were to agree that government has a valid right to sponsor research--with taxpayer dollars--then what should the criteria be for determining studies that benefit the "general welfare"? Should it be limited to protecting life or should it be extended to exploring all the curiosities of the world?
If we were to agree that government has a valid right to sponsor research--with taxpayer dollars--then what should the criteria be for determining studies that benefit the "general welfare"? Should it be limited to protecting life or should it be extended to exploring all the curiosities of the world?
It should support the views of the Party In Power, like the anti-marijuana research of the ‘60’s? Hardly, but some would support that as long as their party is the one in power.
I think there should be wide latitude of research – and yes, at taxpayer expense. Pure research has led to many worthwhile things.