Really, where's the proof or evidence that shows he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?
Let's say Scott went to Timbukto the night of Dec 23rd and much later Lacy and Conner's bodies were found there. That would be an incriminating correlation. Likewise, the present case, though the distance is not as great.
Let's say Scott went to Timbukto the night of Dec 23rd and much later Lacy and Conner's bodies were found there. That would be an incriminating correlation. Likewise, the present case, though the distance is not as great.