Ten seconds ago you were comfortable with transporting entire populations against their will, out of your own discretion, for your own convenience.
Now you won't even admit that the other fellow might like to enjoy a right to maintain his boundaries and his "comfortable" arrangements, for his own convenience.
You're a little inconsistent in the application of a principle.
Oh, wait -- you don't have a principle. I forgot, you're the great robber-chief who would lead us abroad to go a-briganding for blood and plunder.
Well, that's already been done. And anyway, it's not in our scoping document, which see.