How many actually believe this theory? Will it resonate around the world like the "selected not elected" "stolen elction" rhetoric of the last 4 years?
I'm just waiting for W to flip one more Blue State, maybe Wisconsin?
No, I don't think so. If you'll plunk around some other threads here on FR that contain actual returns from places like Cuyahoga county (+217,000 Kerry), you'll see that a number of the precincts showed thousands more votes cast than there were voters on the rolls. The general feeling among many, and I think they may be right, is that Kerry conceded because he knows what an investigation would show, and that it could mean serious trouble for the Dems on fraud.
Just think back to his concession speech. It was firm and unequivocal. "We cannot win," he said. Now, prior to that, did he strike you as a gracious loser? Of course not. Here's a man who blames the Secret Service when he falls down. Makes excuses for why Bush's IQ is higher than his. He's the very antithesis of a gracious loser. So why the unambiguous concession? Because HE knows this needs to be over. I think that's the best explanation of what we saw, and I don't think this idiocy about GOP voter fraud will have traction. If there was anything to that, the MSM would have been all OVER it already.
MM