Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rutles4Ever
I'm a little disappointed in Santorum. He apparently is encouraging Specter to make these conciliatory statements. The skinny is that Santorum is worried about 2006 and will need Specter's support for re-election.

Santorum has lost a huge amount of credibility in my book. to see him make all those impassioned, eloquent, brave arguments for life on the floor of the Senate, and then support a man like Specter, who has no respect for life whatsoever, was repulsive. His support for Specter in light of his most recent comments is just pathetic.

10 posted on 11/08/2004 8:00:17 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: montag813
But you know, Rick Santorum knows that if you remove Spector from the Chairmanship, then Spector becomes an enemy. They can always remove him if he doesn't follow through with his promise to get the Bush nominees through the commmittee.

Another thought is that maybe the pubbies want it to be Spector who reads the political writing on the wall and decides to resign the Chairmanship, rather than push him out. They need to get Spector on the reservation and keep him there because they need his vote.

13 posted on 11/08/2004 8:07:23 AM PST by CWW (Only a few days remaining -- get the vote out folks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson