[Dr. Scarpetta]

If you think that analogy is over the top, consider a conversation my kid had at school last week. They were discussing the election, and the other child said, “Kerry’s for queers.” She also informed my daughter that “God kills queers.”

This article made its way to my local newspaper in PA.

[austinaero]

Religious liberals?
What's the definition of THAT species?

[Always Right]

Get Involved!

Priority 1: Remove Specter from Judiciary (Day 6)

Urgent!  Committee Assignments are being made THIS WEEK!  There are spots on the Judiciary Committee to be assigned.  Tell Sen. Frist and Sen Kyl we need Conservative members on the Judiciary and NO Arlen Specter!

Specter's in line for Chairman, but it can be Challenged!  It has happened in the past.  Moderate Lugar challenged the Great Jesse Helms for Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  A Challenger will have to come forward with the GOP members of the Judicial Committee meet on November 17th!  We need to find a member with the Courage to Challenge.

[austinaero]

Religious liberal=hypocrite (IMHO)

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Here’s the problem: RELIGIOUS LIBERALS don’t wear their faith on their sleeves. We don’t evangelize;

"... and, most importantly: WE DON'T REALLY EXIST -- !" :)

[Socratic]

"We don’t evangelize; we consider it disrespectful to shove our spiritual views down other people’s throats."

Says he from the Cult of the Bloody Fetus.

[wideawake]

Here’s the problem: RELIGIOUS LIBERALS don’t wear their faith on their sleeves. We don’t evangelize

While it is true that leftists who pretend to be Christians don't evangelize in the proper sense of the term - i.e. they don't preach the gospel, they certainly do "evangelize" for socialism.

I'll just point out that someone who claims to be Christian and also claims not to evangelize is simply a liar.

[dsmatuska]

"We don’t evangelize; we consider it disrespectful to shove our spiritual views down other people’s throats."

They have the Supreme Court to do that for them.

[Graybeard58]

I expect Hillary to become an "ordained" minister any day now.

[schaketo]

Religious liberals? Is that an oxymoron?

[frog_jerk_2004]

I know bunches of people who take their faith very seriously and shudder at the works of George Bush: the WARMONGERING, the DISREPECT FOR THE POOR and the WEAK, the ARROGANCE. Here’s the problem: RELIGIOUS LIBERALS don’t wear their faith on their sleeves. We don’t evangelize; we consider it disrespectful to shove our spiritual views down other people’s throats.

Liberals have no problem shoving their left-wing agendas down peoples throats: Gay marriage (Has no religious basis), abortion (has no religious basis), over taxation (has no religious basis) etc... How will the religious left be able to evangelize these stances that are absolutely contrary to anyone of faith?

[headsonpikes]

We don't evangelize...

...except for God's obvious plan of Socialism!

[WestTexasWend]

Liberalism IS their religion! It trumps real religion... how else to explain Kerry's tortured answers on abortion?
Do hope they start spitting and screaming about charity and love, though...that'll really be convincing!

[Juan Medén]

Wow! That was really over the top. Liberals too nice? Now that's an interesting assertion. Like Michael Moore's problem, along with all the shrill left, was that he was just too kind in his attack on Bush.

Right.

[Moleman]

As soon as GWB won re-election religious groups have been deamonized by the left for their support. I don't understand it.

[Enterprise]

This is all so easy my dear. Enlighten us about tolerance to gay marriage and partial birth abortion. Those are Democrat values, not Republican values. Just go right ahead and get in people's faces now, no need to be WASPY and RESTRAINED. Just give it your best shot.

[Cultural Jihad]

That’s partly what being a liberal is about: live and let live.

Tell that to the 45,000,000 people whose lives were terminated by abortionists, or to the 500,000 homosexual men who died from sodomy.

[Mr. Lucky]

God kills queers.

Not an innaccurate translation of Romans 6:23 actually.

[pawdoggie]

Gee, if memory serves, Moses wore his religion on his sleeve. As did Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, etc. This notion that you don't have to witness for your religion in order to be a "good __________(fill in the blank)" is a last 1/3 of the 20th Century phenomenon, the exception not the rule. The truly ironic part is that the people dispensing this bilge are the same folks who think that cross-dressers and other "alternative lifestyle" (former deviant) folks ought to have the absolute right to wear their fetish on their sleeve.

[SwankyC]

because we’re all too damned tasteful and tolerant to be pushy about our beliefs.

I cant believe this came out of a liberals mouth. Im in shock and disbelief

[Publius6961]

WTF is "disrespect for the poor and the weak"?

I haven't read Marx recently but surely, this group of words have meaning in some alternate universe.

Who or what respects idleness, self-indulgence and failure?

Help me out here...