Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: daler

We have enough new, conservative Repubs to counter the defecting Repubs.

We could not counter a fillibuster though, which is why the rules need to be changed.


119 posted on 11/07/2004 4:02:00 PM PST by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas

Bush is already starting on that "capital spending" plan he said he earned...As if the democrats didn't already have a bad enough week (I'm sure Teddy the swimmer is swimming in his vodka now!)


124 posted on 11/07/2004 4:05:25 PM PST by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
We could not counter a fillibuster though, which is why the rules need to be changed.

We could counter a fillibuster if the republicans wouldmake them stick to a true fillibuster. No going home to comfy beds, etc. You can't get anywhere with the current "girlie man" fillibusters!

161 posted on 11/07/2004 4:21:20 PM PST by CAluvdubya (From the RED part of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
I think the Senate rules change WILL happen this term. The last set of rules goes back to the 2000 election and "divided country" even commmittee assignments.

This term the Reps ousted the Dem leader and with the popular vote they should stand behind increasing all of the "big" committees to an extra Republican.

They should also do away with the rule that allows the fillibuster of judges to happen.

274 posted on 11/07/2004 5:57:05 PM PST by WoodstockCat (W2 !!! Four more Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson