Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Democrat Bloggs place all their hopes on Spector and defend him and his actions.
1 posted on 11/07/2004 10:17:50 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vannrox

BUMP for calling, faxing AND emailing Frist and our Senators to BORK (liberal) Spectre.


2 posted on 11/07/2004 10:26:22 AM PST by Libertina (We praise You Lord, You have granted America a Christian leader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox; GeneralHavoc
Contact Senator Frist 202-224-3135

Contact Senator Santorum 202-224-6324

Tell them in no uncertain terms that Specter cannot be made Senate Judiciary Chairman

Do NOT take "no" for an answer!

Bush has no Mandate?

Just say "NO" To Specter's Games!

Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Members

Contact Senator Orrin Hatch 202-224-5251

Contact Senator Charles Grassley 202-224-3744

Contact Senator Jon Kyl 202-224-4521

Contact Senator Mike DeWine 202-224-2315

Contact Senator Jeff Sessions 202-224-4124

Contact Senator Lindsey Graham -202-224-5972

Contact Senator Larry Craig 202-224-2752

Contact Senator Saxby Chambliss 202-224-3521

Contact Senator John Cornyn 202-224-2934

3 posted on 11/07/2004 10:27:02 AM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox

As far as I'm concerned the ball is in Bush's court. If he thinks he can control Specter, fine. If not, then Specter has to go.

If I were Bush, I wouldn't trust Specter any farther than I could kick him. He has betrayed his own party many times in the clinch, and not just on minor votes. He betrayed Bush just a few days ago in this last election. But it's up to Bush. Bush and Rove are totally responsible for Specter's re-election. Therefore, they are totally responsible for what Specter does over the next four years.

I'm willing to give Bush a pass on some issues, but not on judicial nominations. Judicial nominations are absolutely crucial if we are ever to start taking our country back again. I admired his handling of this matter in his first term. He stood firm, unlike most prior Republican presidents. Now we come down to the nitty gritty and see if he can get the job done.

If this isn't handled right, several million conservative Christian voters are liable to stay home in 2006 and 2008.


4 posted on 11/07/2004 10:47:57 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
I'm still trying to figure out Spectre -- is he stupid or what?

He doesn't even have the job yet, and he's insulting the people in charge of hiring him.

Perhaps we should form a useless committee in charge of Scottish Law, and let him chair it for life.

5 posted on 11/07/2004 11:21:54 AM PST by ZOOKER (proudly killing threads since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...

Title: GOP Sen. Specter Vows to Block Bush's Nominees
Source: newsmax
URL Source:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/29/165559.shtml
Published: Oct 29, 2004
Author: newsmax
Post Date: 2004-10-29 20:42:24 by TLBSHOW
3 Comments

Recall that alleged Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, upon winning the primary, immediately backstabbed President Bush, who had campaigned for him instead of actual Republican Pat Toomey. Turns out Specter was just getting started.

We now see that the usually pro-Democrat Pittsburgh Post-Gazette endorsed the sharp-horned RINO in Tuesday's general election for this reason: "Before the Post-Gazette editorial board, he promised that no extremists would be approved for the bench."

What the pro-abortion Specter and pro-abortion Post-Gazette mean by "extremist" is anyone who isn't pro-abortion or who otherwise follows the U.S. Constitution instead of making up legislation from the bench.

"Even if he votes nine out of 10 times for the administration, we trust his word that the 10 percent of difference will be a brake on the worst excesses of a second Bush term, if it comes to that," the pee-yoo P-G snarled.

And there are these facts:

Arlen Specter:

Voted NO on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)

Voted NO on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)


9 posted on 11/07/2004 1:03:57 PM PST by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. + http://www.alamo-girl.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox

True.. the only reason Sprectre was elected is becuase Bush campaigned for him.. Had Bush threw in with Toomey.. Toomey would have won.. Spectre is Bush's fault and probably of Rove's advice.. Ann Coulter was right about Rove.. ROVE is way dumber than he is being given credit for being.. Stupid NO, but dumber... Lets say the boy is NO genius, like Coilter is..
Ann just loves to say the King has no clothes and has small penis besides.. whoever the King is at the time.. Should nake them cover themselves with their hands but alas, arrogance is a naked defence.. with a faux proud attitude.
Humility and gratitude are rare.. The President seems to have some of that..


12 posted on 11/07/2004 1:24:28 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson