1 posted on
11/07/2004 7:42:22 AM PST by
VaBthang4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: All
We need to get the transcript of his remarks. Could someone with TIVO record the West Coast feed and post the exact language?
Thanks.
30 posted on
11/07/2004 7:50:32 AM PST by
kristinn
To: VaBthang4
Spector's just looking for some of that "maverick Republican" TV time currently reserved for McCain.
32 posted on
11/07/2004 7:51:29 AM PST by
IStillBelieve
(G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
To: VaBthang4
Spector seems to think HE has a mandate for himself...
35 posted on
11/07/2004 7:51:54 AM PST by
pattnet
To: VaBthang4
No Chairmanship for him!!!!!!
36 posted on
11/07/2004 7:51:58 AM PST by
Rome2000
(Democrats are perverted socialist crooks)
To: VaBthang4
Specter knows he lost the chairmanship so he has nothing to lose now.
Cutting off his nose to spite his face, kind of like Paul O'Neill did when Dubya fired his rear end.
38 posted on
11/07/2004 7:52:10 AM PST by
OldFriend
(PRAY FOR POWERS EQUAL TO THE TASKS)
To: VaBthang4
I predict that he will switch parties within a year. He's almost there now.
42 posted on
11/07/2004 7:52:47 AM PST by
Mr. Keys
To: VaBthang4
Specter is an ungrateful shill of the Dems... He has to go. He cannot be on the Judiciary committee period. The President has too much to accomplish to allow this dim-wit to stand in the way he didn't even pull PA for Bush get him out now... Petition.
43 posted on
11/07/2004 7:53:23 AM PST by
tomnbeverly
(Its time to spend some political capital... Ouch that has to hurt liberals.)
To: VaBthang4
On another note, Susan Collins is using the Dem talking point "lame duck session."
44 posted on
11/07/2004 7:53:32 AM PST by
ez
(Let the tolerant tolerate my intolerance!)
To: VaBthang4
Specter evidently owes someone in the democratic party a HUGE favor. For Bush, who he is kicking in the teeth, evidently had nothing to do w/ his reelection.
MEMO TO GOP: if you let this ONE DUDE, this ONE GUY STOP GETTING THE CONSERVATIVE JUDGES ON THE COURT AS PROMISED IN THE ELECTION YOU WILL SERIOUSLY TICK OFF THIS REPUBLICAN!!
47 posted on
11/07/2004 7:53:43 AM PST by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon.htm)
To: VaBthang4
"Thufferin thucccotash, we have to put up with Specter for six more years!"
55 posted on
11/07/2004 7:55:02 AM PST by
Enterprise
(The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
To: UMFan
I have to say, if this is reported accurately, it has to go on the side of the argument for denying him the chairmanship, no matter what the repercussions. If he buckles in this context, after a week under withering criticism, what will he do once he's got the brass ring?
Dan
56 posted on
11/07/2004 7:55:08 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: VaBthang4
Now wait a minute. What were his words, exactly?
It's entirely possible he said the President does not have a mandate to do XYZ. Or something similar. Let's not go crazy before we hear his full statement and his subsequent clarifications and his subsequent flip-flopping and the further clarifications to clarify the flip-flopping.
57 posted on
11/07/2004 7:55:21 AM PST by
AM2000
To: VaBthang4
He's goat to go for TWO important reasons
Because he is an impediment to conservative judges reaching the bench
AND because an example needs to be made of him for other RINOS to see what happens if they start spewing their RINO BS
58 posted on
11/07/2004 7:55:43 AM PST by
Cubs Fan
(Liberals have the inverse midas touch, everything they get a hold of turns to S&*%)
To: VaBthang4
The spectre of Specter...
60 posted on
11/07/2004 7:55:50 AM PST by
kennyo
To: VaBthang4
The example of a president who "had a mandate" ............Specter said FDR!
Why in the hell did he not say Ronald Reagan, if he was too Marxist to say George Bush 2004?
Slap the "D" label on him, force him to switch parties, and send him packing...and take Chafee and Hagel with you.
61 posted on
11/07/2004 7:56:01 AM PST by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
To: VaBthang4
to defend spector a little,just a little,also blame the talk show for forcing the question twice,any guest would try to make the host lay off with a somewhat condesending answer..it would not have been asked by Fox news
63 posted on
11/07/2004 7:57:00 AM PST by
rang1995
To: VaBthang4
Hey Spector?
65 posted on
11/07/2004 7:57:27 AM PST by
silent_jonny
(Victory is sooooo sweet!)
To: VaBthang4
This is double plus ungood. Not only does he not believe it, but his comments will bolster the Dems opposition. He needs to be no more than a back bencher on the committee to study migratory rodents.
To: VaBthang4
If President Bush does not have a mandate, then who does? And if there is no mandate now, then what would be the conditions by which a mandate is declared?
To: VaBthang4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson