Skip to comments.
A darker picture of frontier heroes emerges
New York Times News Service via HoustonChronicle.com ^
| Nov. 6, 2004
| RALPH BLUMENTHAL
Posted on 11/07/2004 5:26:23 AM PST by Max Combined
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 last
To: Max Combined
Five words to respond to this tripe ...
Remember the Alamo
Remember Goliad
Santa Ana was no saint.
81
posted on
11/08/2004 6:24:47 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: Racehorse
None of this was ever "covered up" that I remember. We were taught much of in Texas History classes.
82
posted on
11/08/2004 6:26:32 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Max Combined
"People are still coming across skeletons," said the professor, Benjamin Heber Johnson" Major Owens: "Also, to this day sharks still walk around the land waiting for a meal"
83
posted on
11/08/2004 6:30:43 AM PST
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: Doctor Stochastic
None of this was ever "covered up" that I remember. We were taught much of in Texas History classes.Not to mention what we find on the history channel. [smile] Look at what they did with the Alamo. (I enjoyed that particular documentary, though)
I think what we have going on, as reviewed by the Houston Chronicle via the New York Times Service, is academic bone sifting. The story you tell depends on which pile you drop your old bone onto. Voila, a new historical revelation!
To: TexasCowboy
Red Bluff, CA is about 90 miles north of Sacramento. It has its own website - and a fairly good historical society.
85
posted on
11/10/2004 10:09:11 AM PST
by
Maven
To: Max Combined
There was a little-known border war between the US and Mexico in this period. Naturally, the left seizes any excuse to make America look like a murdering bully.
To: MeekOneGOP
87
posted on
11/10/2004 10:15:59 AM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: WorkingClassFilth
Read through the accounts of settlers on the frontier and whites captured by Indian tribes, from the early days of settlement up through the post-Civil War Indian wars, and you find that the Indians fought to win. They slaughtered their enemy and tortured their captives. Not a pretty picture. Their actions made the settlers fear them and react with fierce and brutal policies.
Hey, it was the times. Don't whitewash the truth, MSM, don't rewrite history to fit your PC distorted world view.
88
posted on
11/10/2004 10:24:21 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
(Bush still rules. The sun shines over America.)
To: Fiddlstix
89
posted on
11/10/2004 11:01:00 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Ciexyz
Being a history buff, I thought you might want to look this one up:
VIGILANTE DAYS AND WAYS. Nathaniel Pitt Langford. Copyright 1890, 1912. Original publisher A.C. McClurg & Co. and by permission, A.L. Burt Co.
This is a terrific book that sticks it to the consistent lie about vigilantes being the antithesis of civilization. The account acknowleges error and brutality in some cases, but in large, the need for vigilantism is a noble and proud component of American history. In fact, it may just be the embodiment of the realization of 'self-rule' so worshipped in the Western tradition. Let us not forget that the rise of lynch mobs in the reconstruction south and the KKK were Democrat institutions wrongly attributed to the right.
The use of the vigiante commitees was to stop and punish those for whom the law (and all measures of decency) held no boundaries in a land without just authority. Most on the frontier sought the peace and freedom to pursue their lives, but beyond the organized law (correctly interpreted from the bench), the predators and violent ruled the day - until the 'everyman' stepped up to the plate. A fascinating read and one sure antidote to the Leftist Hollywood demonization of law - justice - in the hands of a righteous people.
90
posted on
11/10/2004 1:52:23 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(From Ku Klux Klan to the modern era of the Koo Kleft Klan...the true legacy of RATs.)
To: WorkingClassFilth
Have any of you actually read the by-laws of this site?? The following is stated plainly:
Purpose: The Free Republic forum is intended for Conservative users who wish to have a serious discussion about political events, conservative principles and the elimination of government corruption and abuse. This is a news and information site not a chat room. Please stay on topic. Free Republic is a supporter of free speech on the Internet but we believe that along with the privilege of free speech comes the responsibility to respect the rights of others.
That being said . . .
Do the statements "Serious discussion" or "Elimination of Governmental corruption & abuse . . .? " carry any significance for any of you?
This discussion, topic &/or Forum has nothing to do with race or the romanticizing of long dead members of any organization . . . . the point of the discussion is how we as a democratic society composed of an amalgam of peoples, cultures & races, choose to work together to nurture the organizations and individuals entrusted to ensure and protect the rights and freedoms outlined in our National Constitution. There are no sacred cows in American society. Honest, sometimes brutal gazes back into our history may perhaps save our butts one day. The more we understand our past, however flawed, the less likely we are to repeat the same injustices and emotional spasms which have kept us from realizing the creed of our Glorious Nation: We hold these truths to be self evident . . . "
The ignorance, racism and pseudo-intellectualism posted on this site makes me sad and further perpetuates the barriers which even now keep us divided. And we have the unmitigated audacity to label others as intolerant. God save us all!
91
posted on
03/21/2006 6:29:58 PM PST
by
jorod4u
(Am I the only one filled with revulsion>)
To: jorod4u
Thanks for the spanking. I'm saddened that you're saddened but I'm not sure what it is you're saddened about. You've posted to specifically to me but you direct you comments to a collective us. Seems more like a whine to me; so what's the problem? Are you looking for a footnoted analysis of American racism, failures in our foreign policy or a detailed action plan to reclaim academe and overturn revisionism? Seems to me that reproof without specifics does nothing but help mollify your own sense of outrage. I suspect that you've got way too much time on your hands if you've taken on the task of correcting doctrine and posting etiquette.
92
posted on
03/22/2006 5:41:02 AM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson