Posted on 11/07/2004 3:40:54 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Mustn't gloat, mustn't gloat. Instead, we must try and look sober and reflective and then step smartly to the side and let the Democrats tear themselves apart.
I'm reluctant to intrude on family grief, especially as the Dems are doing such a sterling job all by themselves. But, when big shot Democrats look at Tuesday's results and instantly announce the reason they flopped out was because . . .
Whoa, hang on a minute, my apologies. There's been a clerical error here: That was my post-election column from 2002. My post-election column from 2004 goes like . . . well, actually, it goes pretty much the same. It'd be easier just to take the second week in November off every two years and let my editors run the timeless classic whither-the-Democrats? column. All that changes is the local color. In 2002, I was very taken by the band at Missouri Democratic headquarters attempting to rouse the despondent faithful with Steve Allen's peppy anthem, "This Could Be the Start of Something Big,'' and noted that the party faced the opposite problem: This could be the end of something small.
As they've done for a decade now, the Democrat bigwigs worried about it for a couple of weeks and then rationalized it away: In 2000 they lost because Bush stole the "election"; in 2002 they lost because of that "vicious" attack ad on Max Cleland. The official consolation for this year's biennial bust hasn't yet been decided on, but Tom Daschle's election-eve lawsuit alone offers several attractive runners, including the complaint that Democrats were intimidated by Republicans ''rolling their eyes.'' Could be a lot more of that if this keeps up.
So it seems likely -- just to get my 2006 post-election column out of the way here -- that in a couple years' time the Democrats will have run on the same thin gruel as usual and be mourning the loss of another two or three Senate seats. You want names and states? Well, how about West Virginia? Will the 88-year old Robert C. Byrd be on the ballot in 2006? And, if he's not, what are the Dems' chances of stopping West Virginia's transformation to permanent "red state" status?
It also seems likely -- just to get my 2012 post-election column out of the way here -- that in eight years' time the Dems will have run on the same thin gruel as usual and, thanks to the 2010 census and the ongoing shift of population to the South and West, lost another five House seats and discovered that the "blue states" are worth even less in the Electoral College -- though in fairness their only available presidential candidate, the young dynamic Southerner 94-year-old Robert C. Byrd, managed to hold all but three of Kerry's states.
I had a bet with myself this week: How soon after election night would it be before the Bush-the-chimp-faced-moron stuff started up again? 48 hours? A week? I was wrong. Bush Derangement Syndrome is moving to a whole new level. On the morning of Nov. 2, the condescending left were convinced that Bush was an idiot. By the evening of Nov. 2, they were convinced that the electorate was. Or as London's Daily Mirror put it in its front page: "How Can 59,054,087 People Be So DUMB?"
Well, they're British lefties: They can do without Americans. Whether an American political party can do without Americans is more doubtful. Nonetheless, MSNBC.com's Eric Alterman was mirroring the Mirror's sentiments: "Slightly more than half of the citizens of this country simply do not care about what those of us in the 'reality-based community' say or believe about anything." Over at Slate, Jane Smiley's analysis was headlined, "The Unteachable Ignorance Of The Red States.'' If you don't want to bother plowing your way through Alterman and Smiley, a placard prominently displayed by a fetching young lad at the post-election anti-Bush rally in San Francisco cut to the chase: "F--- MIDDLE AMERICA."
Almost right, man. It would be more accurate to say that "MIDDLE AMERICA" has "F---ed" you, and it will continue to do so every two years as long as Democrats insist that anyone who disagrees with them is, ipso facto, a simpleton -- or "Neanderthal," as Teresa Heinz Kerry described those unimpressed by her husband's foreign policy. In my time, I've known dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts and other members of Britain's House of Lords and none of them had the contempt for the masses one routinely hears from America's coastal elites. And, in fairness to those ermined aristocrats, they could afford Dem-style contempt: A seat in the House of Lords is for life; a Senate seat in South Dakota isn't.
More to the point, nobody who campaigns with Ben Affleck at his side has the right to call anybody an idiot. H. L. Mencken said that no one ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the American people. Well, George Soros, Barbra Streisand and a lot of their friends just did: The Kerry campaign and its supporters -- MoveOn.org, Rock The Vote, etc. -- were awash in bazillions of dollars, and what have they got to show for it? In this election, the plebs were more mature than the elites: They understood that war is never cost-free and that you don't run away because of a couple of setbacks; they did not accept that one jailhouse scandal should determine America's national security interest; they rejected the childish caricature of their president and paranoid ravings about Halliburton; they declined to have their vote rocked by Bruce Springsteen or any other pop culture poser.
All the above is unworthy of a serious political party. As for this exit-poll data that everyone's all excited about, what does it mean when 22 percent of the electorate say their main concern was "moral issues"? Gay marriage? Abortion? Or is it something broader? For many of us, the war is also a moral issue, and the Democrats are on the wrong side of it, standing not with the women voting proudly in Afghanistan's first election but with the amoral and corrupt U.N., the amoral and cynical Jacques Chirac, the amoral and revolting head-hackers whom Democratic Convention guest of honor Michael Moore described as Iraq's ''minutemen.''
At some point in both the 2000 and 2004 campaigns, your typical media liberal would feign evenhandedness and bemoan the way the choice has come down to "two weak candidates.''
But, in that case, how come the right's weak candidates are the ones that win? Because a weak candidate pushing strong ideas is better than a weak candidate who's had no ideas since Roe vs. Wade.
The loud wailing is because this was a make or break election for the liberal policy machine in DC. The money isn't flowing into the coffers the way it used, what with downsized congressional staff, minority positions, think-tanks not having anyone to talk to. A lot of them are going to have to pack up, go home, and try to get paying jobs working for someone who will expect honest effort in return for a wage.
bttt
LOL. That's what I was thinking. Steyn is one smart cat, huh? He can phrase tricky dynamics, positions, and problems in such a clear and clever way that even morons like me can understand.
Thanks.
bump
"Bush Derangement Syndrome" - I love it.
Not to try to improve greatness but maybe the problem with that lad's sign in SF was punctuation. I think it should read "F--- [comma] MIDDLE AMERICA" Throw in an exclamation point at the end if you wish.
...For many of us, the war is also a moral issue, and the Democrats are on the wrong side of it...
Just listened to Juan Williams on FOX whine that AMERICA did not vote "Logically" since the voters have been saying that "America was going in the wrong direction" and yet voted for Bush.
Democrats, in their arrogance, do not understand that when Middle America says "we are going down the wrong track", they are talking about the Liberal culture and influence in the MSM, movies, MTV, etc...They are not talking about the presidents policy but about the challenge we faced as a nation. On Nov 2, this repugnant "philosophy" was rejected and the masses want to go in a different direction.
I doubt the Democrats will understand.
I guess it comes down to which is stronger -- our will to live or the terrorists' will to power.
"Look at Cali, Oregon and Washington, a tiny, weeny, bit of these states were blue!"
Alas, there is a mass of human misery crammed into those tiny, weeny bits......
This guy is such a gift.
They say there are two kinds of brilliance. One is to explain things that nobody else could understand without great effort (theory of relativity, for example). The other is to make connections nobody ever made before, only to have the reader/listener say "Of course, that was obvious. Why didn't I think of that?"
Steyn is incredibly brilliant in the second way.
It's not his way with words that's amazing. It's the connections that he makes (Being a member of the House of Lords is a lifetime appointment, unlike being a senator from South Dakota).
Exactly...I live in NYC...the elite media and their liberal followers never seem to think outside the box...wrong direction only means their issue of the day--in this case Iraq...for many of us Iraq is off the table...we're there so we will finish it...we support our troops so we won't undermine their Commander in Chief...the direction of the country has to do with other issues such as 1.5 million abortions a year, immigration, etc...for smart people they sure are dumb.
I love Steyn. Nobody says it better!
I'm glad you brought up the subject of "right direction; wrong direction" as a polling quesiton. I was always dumbfounded that the MSM would not question such a silly poll. The concept is so ambiguous as to be meningless. I'm a traditional minded gal. If a stranger called me to ask me some poll quesitons, I would have probably answered "yes," that we are going in the wrong direction. Of course I may have added, "That's why I'm voting for Bush!" But, naturally, they would not have allowed me to editorialize my answer. LOL!
Rush has been saying for years that the dems are using the same playbook since FDR days .. tax cuts for the rich .. no funding for education .. yada yada yada.
I agree with Steyn .. no new ideas since Roe v. Wade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.