Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rastus

Even Fox News refused to call Nevada, because it put the President over the top.

Nevada is experiencing a tremendous growth in population. Who was to know how these new people were going to vote, especially when you consider that a lot of the new Nevadians are ex-Californians? It was a case of where the old rules might not apply to the new Nevada--caution advised. Same story in parts of New Mexico. And in both states you have to consider how few people actually live in these states, so even small changes can make a huge difference in the final outcome.

19 posted on 11/07/2004 4:31:45 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: elli1

Nevada is experiencing a tremendous growth in population. Who was to know how these new people were going to vote, especially when you consider that a lot of the new Nevadians are ex-Californians? It was a case of where the old rules might not apply to the new Nevada--caution advised

You're so right. I'm from the Deep Blue Bay Area and know of quite a few people who have moved to the Las Vegas suburbs.
Fox had good reasons not to call NV and NM.


31 posted on 11/07/2004 9:39:50 AM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson