Skip to comments.
Creative Ways of Breaking the Filibuster (Vanity)
Brainstorming with Free Republic
| 11/05/2004
| TribeMike
Posted on 11/05/2004 7:11:01 PM PST by Tribemike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
11/05/2004 7:11:01 PM PST
by
Tribemike
To: Tribemike
Turn the thermostat in the senate chamber up to 150.
2
posted on
11/05/2004 7:12:11 PM PST
by
dr_who_2
To: Tribemike
>>
"1. Ted Kennedy's liver finally gives out"<<
No offense, but I wish we could refrain from stuff like thus. :-( Too DU-ish for my taste.
3
posted on
11/05/2004 7:13:07 PM PST
by
Dan Middleton
(Hang on sloopy / Sloopy hang on / Hang on sloopy / Sloopy hang on / Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah...)
To: Dan Middleton
Lighten up...I posted it as humor....
4
posted on
11/05/2004 7:13:50 PM PST
by
Tribemike
(Here is the text of the article....)
To: Tribemike
The only way to break a filibuster is to do it the old-fashioned way. Those who wish unlimited debate must actually debate. They must keep the Senate in session 24/7 while the filibusterers talk on and on. They can make arguments, read recipes or read from the phone directory, but they must stand and talk, not state an intention to talk.
This means shutting down all other business in the Senate until the filibuster is broken by a cloture vote or we throw in the towel.
The Democrats don't have the stomach for that kind of warfare.
It's time we go to the mattresses.
5
posted on
11/05/2004 7:16:47 PM PST
by
Publius
(Digital Minuteman)
To: Dan Middleton
"No offense, but I wish we could refrain from stuff like thus."
I second that.
To: Tribemike
Lighten up...I posted it as humor.... Of course it's humor; but a joke about someone dying or getting gravely ill is something we should leave for the liberals and democrats.
We are better than that. -
7
posted on
11/05/2004 7:18:36 PM PST
by
bobk333
To: Publius
That's the truth. Time to grow some teeth up there!!! Besides, I would love to hear KKK Byrd after a few hours of talking. We could only imagine lol.
8
posted on
11/05/2004 7:20:33 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: Publius
Agreed, winning this election wasn't easy, and it may be our best chance at choosing judges, those congresscritters had better be UP TO the jobs we elected them to do.
You'd think they would know by now how the voters feel, but maybe we should nudge them a little....
9
posted on
11/05/2004 7:21:50 PM PST
by
IceAge
To: Tribemike
Well the most obvious is if you are a DIM senator from a "Red State" look no further than Dacshle to see what could happen. I'm sure they are taking notice to that fact. BUT, I'm sure at the same time the liberal extremist groups will get to these same senators and threaten a liberal primary challenger. It will suck to be a moderate DIM senator when judge time comes around. Either way they lose.
10
posted on
11/05/2004 7:23:48 PM PST
by
KoRn
To: Tribemike
Get Lincoln Chaffee a sex change operation. Turn him into a man.
11
posted on
11/05/2004 7:24:16 PM PST
by
btybrdy
To: Publius
12
posted on
11/05/2004 7:24:55 PM PST
by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: Tribemike
All wide of the point.
Seems to be discovered again and again by the people that all that is needed, is for the Senate to, at the beginning of that congressional congress, vote that Filibustering is not available, in either part, as in Judicial nominees, or in whole, ie, no filibuster at all.
This is a straight up or down 51% vote, no filibuster is allowed.
Write your reps that you want this action taken at the seating of the next congressional session!
Thinking about it, old Teddy Roosevelt would have had the cojones for it.
BTW, so would Teddy K, and he would be hailed as a hero for it.
13
posted on
11/05/2004 7:25:48 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: btybrdy
14
posted on
11/05/2004 7:26:20 PM PST
by
Tribemike
(Here is the text of the article....)
To: Publius
This means shutting down all other business in the Senate until the filibuster is broken by a cloture vote or we throw in the towel.Absolutely. Rules is rules. It would make for great television on a selected issue and the Dem obstructionism would be revealed as the media covered: Filibuster Day 34! A barely coherent Ted Kennedy droning on and on...
15
posted on
11/05/2004 7:26:26 PM PST
by
rhombus
To: rhombus
Do our pubbies have the guts?
To: Tribemike
> Any other ideas?
The fb is a creation of the Senate itself.
They can uncreate it.
Even if Spector has an attack of honesty and switches
to the Democrat party.
17
posted on
11/05/2004 7:29:02 PM PST
by
Boundless
(Swifty John O'Neill for US Attorney General, or at least Solicitor General)
To: Tribemike
Teddy's liver??? Here you go from the DFU Archives ---
MIDI - YELLOW RIVER
Poor, poor Ted
we just heard the news
Could it be that hes had too much booze
He holds a seat that the RATS may lose
Teddys liver
Hey Jane Swift, dear, are you all set
You will soon get your chance, we bet
Poor Tom Daschle
his pants are all wet
Teddys liver
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
his doc says it is pretty bad
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
the vast right wing is feeling sad
If only there could be a way to hear from Mary Jo
Were sure she would say its a tragic way to go
Poor, poor Teddys liver
When hes gone, it will seem so odd
No waitress sandwich with his pal, Dodd
So raise your glass and lets give him a nod
Teddys liver
When the time comes to say goodbye
We will not see one dry eye
Like Ron Brown, will Scumbag laugh and then cry
Teddys liver
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
his doc says its pretty bad
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
the vast right wing is feeling sad
If only there could be a way to hear from Mary Jo
Were sure she would say that its a tragic way to go
Poor, poor Teddys liver
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
his doc says its pretty bad
Teddys liver, Teddys liver
the right wing is feeling sad
18
posted on
11/05/2004 7:29:50 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Michael Moore = a culinary Pinocchio ---- tell a lie, gain a pound.)
To: Tribemike
Folks, they don't need to "break" a filibuster. At the beginning of the Congress, they vote on the rules. Simply add a rule that filibusters cannot be used on Presidential nominations. The Dims will whine, but they can clearly do it. I think Lott was hinting at this the other day.
19
posted on
11/05/2004 7:30:34 PM PST
by
Timmy
To: Tribemike
Make the opposition do a real filibuster not the faux ones the DemocRATS like and Republicans allow.
20
posted on
11/05/2004 7:31:00 PM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson