Skip to comments.
Saskatchewan to allow same-sex marriages
Globe and Mail ^
| Nov 5, 2004
| Darren Yourk
Posted on 11/05/2004 2:37:42 PM PST by Ahriman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Alberta's Child
Somebody already made the Segway Personal Mobility machine. :P
21
posted on
11/05/2004 2:57:26 PM PST
by
nhoward14
(Freedom costs a buck-o-five.)
To: Ahriman
It seems like the only idea that liberals have anymore is hitching up gay couples.
22
posted on
11/05/2004 2:57:45 PM PST
by
Jim_Curtis
(Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
To: Ahriman
Does the "traditional" definition of marriage discriminate against single people? I'm feeling left out.
23
posted on
11/05/2004 2:59:50 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(President Bush got 51 percent of the vote, a figure higher than that of any Democrat in 40 years.)
To: Ahriman
AND here is the first two to apply for a marriage lisence.
they make such a perfect couple :-)
24
posted on
11/05/2004 3:08:00 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
To: Ahriman
The real, and most dangerous, problem here is that the good judge has denied majority rule or sentiment on the basis of her own beliefs and desires.
The biggest difference between a conservative and a liberal is not this or that social issue, but whether they actually believe and accept majority rule. Accepting majority rule means adhering to what a representative republic concludes on the basis of votes. Liberals, and RATS in general, prefer the rule by the wise and few -- philosopher kings with judicial robes.
To: scripter
possible story for your homosexual agenda ping list
26
posted on
11/05/2004 8:08:13 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(http://chonlalonde.blogspot.com)
To: Alberta's Child
Saskatchewan.The most damning thing you can say about Saskatchewan is that they travel in droves down to Eastern Montana for the shopping and excitement.
To: muawiyah
...his 30 wives?Man... that would surely drive an man insane, if not kill him... 30 wives. Yap... yap... yap... yap... yap... (30 times over)
28
posted on
11/05/2004 8:15:43 PM PST
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: Ahriman
Another reason why American liberals need to immigrate north!
To: freepatriot32; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
Thanks for the ping!
Let me know if you want on or off the homosexual agenda ping list.
30
posted on
11/05/2004 8:21:44 PM PST
by
scripter
(Tens of thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: Ahriman
Canada keeps doing things that will make it more and more difficult for us to agree to admit them as our 51st state.
To: RonF
The Canadian courts are appointed by the federal government. An appeal on the matter is currently pending with the Supreme Court Of Canada. There are two options: Parliament can pass a constitutional amendment and Provincial Parliaments can exercise a "notwithstanding" clause to opt out of the ruling. None have currently done so.
32
posted on
11/05/2004 8:39:23 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Imagine him locked up inside a two room cabin in the woods in Saskatchewan during that long, hard, cold, bitter, miserable, nasty Canadian winter!
A fit punishment for any judge, eh?!
33
posted on
11/06/2004 6:16:07 AM PST
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson