Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G Larry
if the criterion for "X should be criminalized" is "X has societal 'net negatives'" then that's true whether X is marijuana or alcohol (or eating unhealthily or getting too little sleep).

Wrong!

Marijuana IS criminalized. No change required.
Alcohol is NOT criminalized. No change required.

Now you're changing your argument, to "laws should remain as is." I guess that also applies to nearly-unrestricted abortion, and still-too-high tax rates?

329 posted on 11/26/2004 9:42:27 AM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights

No, I am straightening out your "should" vs. real world "is".

Societies "net negatives" will only be resolved in heaven.
That is no reason to choose to add to them.


332 posted on 11/26/2004 10:23:10 AM PST by G Larry (Time to update my "Support John Thune!" tagline. Thanks to all who did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson