Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey
Well, yeah, other than that, sure.

Plus the court's definition of liability has been expanded in civil suits to include anyone and everyone who had any contact whatsoever with the drinker. Plus the penalties have increased.

Legal status aside, there are many other reasons (price, taxes, social stigma, etc.). Don't let Know your rights (aka MrLeRoy) define and limit the scope of the argument -- a favorite tactic of his.

239 posted on 11/09/2004 7:44:05 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
(aka MrLeRoy)

?

240 posted on 11/09/2004 7:46:08 AM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen; WildTurkey
Legal status aside, there are many other reasons (price, taxes, social stigma, etc.)

Insofar as nonlegal factors affect recreational substance use, your claim that a drop in drug use must be due to the legal war on drugs falls flat. Thanks for exposing the weakness of your own argument.

280 posted on 11/10/2004 3:59:57 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson