I guess the sense of being able to educate my child could be viewed as a private issue. Where I do not give money to a pool for the government to educate my child. Where I educate my child to my standards.
I guess this makes sense. Do we accept what comes from total private unobtrusive education.
While it may appear to be nitpicking, I'd like to focus on the wording you used here to make an important point.
"Do we accept"
What is this "we"? You may hold one opinion while I hold another. More to the point, if I desire private unobtrusive education, it makes no difference if you approve of my decision, because the education of my child is solely my prerogative.
The collectivist bent you put on the issue: "our children", "do we accept" accepts as a matter of course that children are collectively owned, and that the parents wishes of their children's education can be forcibly overridden by the collective.
This begs the question: Are we free people with self determination, or are we farm animals whose decisions are made by a farmer that calls himself government?