[TruthCanHurt]

I also agree. Where can we get updates on the number of provisionals in Wisconsin and New Hampshire? Where can we get the count of military absentee ballots that need to be counted in these states?

[steveegg]

Wish I could help you about the number of overseas absentee ballots in Wisconsin, but the presstitutes are clammed up. Any provisionals (because of same-day on-site registration, they were to go only to those who registered by mail, were voting for the first time and could not produce any ID or anyone to vouch for them) would have been counted at the end of the day Wednesday (those casting them had until 4 pm Wednesday to produce the ID).

I'll make the same argument I did about Iowa the last 2 days. All absentee ballots that were back by 11/2 (other than overseas ballots, no late arrivals are accepted) were counted on 11/2. If Bush carried the overseas absentee vote by 70%-30% (IIRC, that's the projection), for Bush to make up the difference, there would need to still be nearly 30,000 overseas absentee ballots out. It's theoretically possible (I'll also note the 'RATs delayed the mailing of ballots with their attempt to keep Nader off the ballot), but highly unlikely.

[The_Reader_David]

I second your question. Neither Wisconsin's nor New Hampshire's Secretary of State's offices have anything useful on the web, like how many provisionals were cast, how many overseas absentee ballots were sent but not yet returned, or not yet counted.