Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hil won't squelch chatter on '08 bid
New York Daily News ^ | 11/05/04 | MAGGIE HABERMAN

Posted on 11/05/2004 1:33:27 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: FormerACLUmember

lol. You understand the hillary dress-up doll figurine, perfectly! lol!


41 posted on 11/05/2004 6:28:00 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Terry MacAuliffe has done his job.

Looking at the stable of swayback thoroughbreds on the Democrat side of the aisle, there is no one there.

The primaries are all jammed up at the beginning of the electoral calendar where a cadre of ideologue loons can 3 Stooge each other to death gouging eyes, slapping faces, pulling hair and attacking Republicans in a fight for the Democratic nomination.

Hillary will not enter any primaries except as a write-in.

However, she and her minions will be working furiously to energize a cacophony of screeching harpies to beg and plead with her to run for the sake of the party.

"Help us Obi-wan Hillary, you're our only hope."

Reluctant on the surface but gleeful in actuality she will reconsider and enter for the good of the party. And she will be unsullied by the primary battles.

Any negatives from Republican opponents will be met with a "This is why I did not want to run in the primaries since I KNEW IT WOULD BE SO NEGATIVE." All the while her minions will be feverishly slinging and digging dirt she will insist on running a campaign on the "issues."

I'm getting sick just writing this crap knowing that she and the LSM will be doing exactly this.

2004 was just a prelude or dry run, if you will, to test how the scenario would pan out.

Coming soon to a CBS station, Today Show and Oprah near you.

Stay tuned.

42 posted on 11/05/2004 6:34:22 AM PST by N. Theknow ("We will take your money and use it for the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo

I'm certainly happy to contribute to such a thread. I've got to keep my BIG focus on something else.


44 posted on 11/05/2004 6:54:24 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alia

We already did the 2-for-1 deal and got SHORT-CHANGED! I know she'll run, but we need to put up our best man to oppose her and Bill because I for one can't stand the thought of another co-presidency!


45 posted on 11/05/2004 7:02:33 AM PST by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
lol! Thanks for reminding me about the 2for1 deal in re Clintons. I saw the Kerry Campaign as a 4 for 1 deal. Americans rejected the Medusa Hair Campaign. :) This co-presidency stuff, is, ick, so freakin' juvenile. However, when the Clintons ran on this, I interpreted this to be their "pro-marriage-of-any-make-up" subliminal to their party animals around the, um, "globe".

It worked for a little while.. Americans were fooled even less by re-electing the Medusa's Hair duo in 1996. But Dems didn't get it! They decided to run a 4-for-1 deal in 2004. Or as Rush would say: They figured they lost in 2000 because not enough socialism was "put on the table". lol... :) Ipso, the Kerry campaign.

I'm sorry to hear about Liz Edward's breast lump. However, I'm going to be crude here: Is her breast lump ANY EXCUSE FOR ANY OF HER VISCIOUS "UTTERANCES" DURING THE CAMPAIGN? no.

46 posted on 11/05/2004 7:51:38 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo

lol.... one trickster taking the place of another..


49 posted on 11/05/2004 8:00:40 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
OK - now what about Rick Santorum? What are his chances?

I think his stock has to have gone way up with the results of this election. Morality is "hot."

The only I problem I see is with the RINO money men. Prior to the election, and even now, I suspect they would have supported Guiliani, Schwarzenegger or Romney --and even Jeb Bush.

But the results of this election may make Santorum an acceptable candidate for them because "he can win."

50 posted on 11/05/2004 8:04:29 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Oh, I'm having the best time being the senator from New York," was all Clinton would say in her first appearance since Election Day when asked by reporters if she would be the new standard-bearer for the Democratic Party.

Then perhaps she should shut that gaping, bottomless hole of a mouth and actually *do* something for NY, instead of just talking about it. Ever since she was elected, she has done precious little for NY, and has spent *far* more time and energy raising her national profile.

The Hillary Watch

51 posted on 11/05/2004 8:42:46 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick (www.HillaryWatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The GOP threw a party and truckloads of Catholics showed up. They do NOT want to send their newest guests packing, so I'm going to lay odds that the next presidential nominee will absolutely be pro-life, and possibly Catholic. This eliminates Giuliani on both counts. The center right can accept a pro-life president who's fiscally conservative. If keeping the newly acquired Catholic vote means keeping Giuliani, Powell, and Rice off the ticket (unless as VP's), then they will do so.

It's time for Catholics who voted for Bush to reach out to evangelicals who apparently voted for Bush 75%, set aside religious debate and concentrate on what we agree on - NO ABORTION, NO EUTHANASIA, NO EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, NO CLONING. We have an opportunity to consign Roe V. Wade to the ash heap of history. We need to strike while the iron's hot and make sure Arlen Specter and his ilk aren't on the judiciary committee.

As President Bush said "I've earned this political currency, I'm gonna spend it."


52 posted on 11/05/2004 8:47:53 AM PST by Rutles4Ever ("...upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"In a second term I would hope that the President and his team would be more willing to listen to people with different ideas and different points of view, and to forge some common ground," she said.



There's no common ground with Marxism.


53 posted on 11/05/2004 8:56:03 AM PST by Deo volente (God willing, Terri Schiavo will live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

It's all about Hillary. She'll suck the oxygen right out of the Dem Party and the Dem party will suffocate and like it.


54 posted on 11/05/2004 8:57:28 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson