Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

One of many hoots to be had within:"There is honor, moreover, in a certain kind of loss.

What a bunch of wankers. What a bunch of girlie men.

1 posted on 11/04/2004 10:55:38 PM PST by thegreatbeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: thegreatbeast

BTTT


2 posted on 11/04/2004 10:57:07 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
"This is not the apocalypse."

Yes it is, flee for Canada, flee for Canada. They have socialize medicine, fly vacines...and medical pot!

3 posted on 11/04/2004 10:59:39 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
One of many hoots to be had within:"There is honor, moreover, in a certain kind of loss. What a bunch of wankers. What a bunch of girlie men.

Let them keep talking like that.

Losers talking like losers.

4 posted on 11/04/2004 11:00:07 PM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
George W. Bush and Dick Cheney governed in a radically sectarian manner, in conformity with only the wishes of their hallowed base

So??? So did Bill Clinton but the media didn't demand unity from a divided nation then.

5 posted on 11/04/2004 11:00:13 PM PST by GeronL (Congratulations Bush on your re-election VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

Dem party sounds more and more like a doomsday cult waiting for the mothership to take them back to their home planet.


6 posted on 11/04/2004 11:00:32 PM PST by stopillegalimmigration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
"There is honor, moreover, in a certain kind of loss."

The New Republic is beginning to sound like the American Conservative...

8 posted on 11/04/2004 11:02:34 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

51% is something they haven't seen in over 20 yrs. We've seen it a number of times.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 11:02:54 PM PST by madison46 (I now suffer from election cynicism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
... the popular vote in the election of 2004 was 51 percent for Bush and 48 for Kerry, and those are not the numbers of a political or philosophical rout.

Oh really. Bill Clinton got 43% in 1992 and 49% in 1996. Not what I'd call a mandate. After the close outcome in 2000, I'd say a president who gets elected with a majority of the popular vote for the first time in 16 and sees his party increase their majorities in both houses of Congress, is a president with a mandate from the people. And George W.Bush isn't gonna sit on his hands for the next 4 years either.

12 posted on 11/04/2004 11:03:17 PM PST by Reagan Man ("America has spoken")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
This Constitution is not easy to destroy.

But the Left has tried its darnedest for decades!

13 posted on 11/04/2004 11:03:54 PM PST by Lexinom (Washington State: Too extreme for the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

Yep I hope they will enjoy it as they continue to loose


15 posted on 11/04/2004 11:04:42 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
But it is the most formidable challenge to American liberalism in our time.

Amen. Ain't it grand?

17 posted on 11/04/2004 11:06:11 PM PST by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
this is a country divided against itself"

By their definition, when has it NOT been "divided"?

Divided to them seems to mean when there is a diversity of opinion. Well, DUH! There is a diversity of opinion even among Bush voters. These people need to get out of the office more often, maybe mingle with people who don't think precisely as they do.

18 posted on 11/04/2004 11:06:14 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

Where is the gag alert on this monumental piece of petulant drivel?


19 posted on 11/04/2004 11:06:27 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
51-48

So how do they explain 55-44-1?

-PJ

21 posted on 11/04/2004 11:08:21 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast
...What a bunch of wankers.<<<

That reminds me of one of the funniest signs of all time - the day Bagdhad fell, some Iraqis that liked the idea of saddam being gone held up a sign:

Go Home You Peace Activist Wankers

Absolutely priceless!!

22 posted on 11/04/2004 11:08:53 PM PST by HardStarboard (Surrounded by Kerry/Edwards Signs in Washington State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

"Failure can be defined in many ways" is a similar saying that comes to mind. Jeez.


24 posted on 11/04/2004 11:18:07 PM PST by merry10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

Ann Coulter said it best: Seeing the wringing of hands & being able to witness the meltdown means the Bush victory is a gift which keeps on giving!


26 posted on 11/04/2004 11:21:26 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

Without their massive vote fraud (that failed this time), the real numbers would be along the lines of 55-45.

Without the mainstream media propping up their candidates, it would be at least 65-35.


27 posted on 11/04/2004 11:25:01 PM PST by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

most of their 'we believe X' is gibberish ...

many millions of Americans who believe that the tax code should be more fair; and that one of the ends of government is to bother itself about its neediest and least fortunate citizens;"

... implying that Bush and the $2 trillion Federal Govt - 70% of it gong to transfer payments - would disappear. That gouging the rich = 'fair' etc.

They lost because they believe their own lies. Still.


29 posted on 11/04/2004 11:28:01 PM PST by WOSG (Liberate Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thegreatbeast

"their smallness and their indifference to the evidence of experience beyond their own."

Irony anyone? Anyone? Bueller?


32 posted on 11/04/2004 11:39:44 PM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson