Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore finally speaks
MichaelMoore.com ^ | Nov. 5th, 2004 | Michael Moore

Posted on 11/04/2004 9:32:38 PM PST by Validus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-259 next last
To: Validus
Translation:

"Oh, I don't want any of those grapes anyway. They're probably sour."

121 posted on 11/04/2004 10:05:13 PM PST by Allegra (FOUR MORE YEARS!! WOOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prometheus; Validus
Bush's victory was the NARROWEST win for a sitting president since Woodrow Wilson in 1916.

Woodrow Wilson did not receive a majority in 1916; W did in 2004!

122 posted on 11/04/2004 10:05:38 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I believe the Kennedy win over Nixon was much narrower.

The requirement Moore puts in place is that it be a "sitting President".

This site confirms cheeseburger's claim.

123 posted on 11/04/2004 10:05:50 PM PST by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: All

I can't wait until he "helps" Hildebeast's campaign!!! I bet she can't either!HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


124 posted on 11/04/2004 10:05:52 PM PST by CAluvdubya (From the RED part of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Validus
6. Michigan voted for Kerry! So did the entire Northeast, the birthplace of our democracy

Hmmm... I think VIRGINIA may played a minor role in the birth of our democracy, and it went for Bush. Moore is so stupid.

125 posted on 11/04/2004 10:06:17 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Some pundit said yesterday that he knew the dems would lose as soon as he saw Moore and Jimmy Carter seated together at the dem convention.


126 posted on 11/04/2004 10:06:30 PM PST by Conservababe (Liberal...One whose mind is so open the brains are spilling out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: prometheus
I would check out the Truman vs. Dewey Race.

49.8% vs. 45.1%

128 posted on 11/04/2004 10:06:38 PM PST by dread78645 (Truth is always the right answer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: prometheus
Wilson’s triumph in the Democratic convention of 1912 was not assured, but in the end owed much to former nominee William Jennings Bryan. The main challenge in the campaign came from Theodore Roosevelt, the Bull Moose candidate, who trumpeted his progressive message as the “New Nationalism.” Wilson responded with a vigorous campaign of his own and dubbed his more restrained form of progressivism as the “New Freedom.” Both reform candidates recognized that the main issue of the day was the relationship between big business and government. Wilson’s whopping electoral victory was somewhat misleading; he received only about 42 percent of the popular vote, but that was sufficient to become the first Democratic president in 20 years.
129 posted on 11/04/2004 10:07:04 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Validus

Number 18. Hey we came in second - that's not bad!!


130 posted on 11/04/2004 10:07:28 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MorseMoose

He may be the "#1 liberal in the Senate" but he tried like hell not to appear to be one.


131 posted on 11/04/2004 10:07:29 PM PST by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Bush/Cheney '04: "Four more years of hell".......for the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Validus
LARDASS!

The Real Logo of the Democrat Party

132 posted on 11/04/2004 10:07:34 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe

There ya go..I though much the same when I saw Carter ( the worst president in US history ) sitting with that fat slob. What the hell were they thinking ? Yep MM helped Bush win..I say we push that slogan till Moore dies of shame or his comrads stab him in the back .


133 posted on 11/04/2004 10:08:29 PM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian

Yep....but you're talking to a lot of deaf ears here.

The worm has turned already


134 posted on 11/04/2004 10:09:16 PM PST by wardaddy (The only thing we share with collectivists and ragheads is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Validus
Five more African Americans were elected as members of Congress, including the return of Cynthia McKinney of Georgia. It's always good to have more blacks in there fighting for us and doing the job our candidates can't.

My question for Moore is: Can you wear your baseball cap and your Klan hood at the same time. His comment is the most patronizing bit b.s. I've ever heard. Way to talk to people who JUST HAPPEN TO BE BLACK there, fatty.

135 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:06 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (W04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian

Given that the president won't have to try to appease anyone to keep their vote any longer, look for his agenda to move to the right dramatically. When he does that, and his policies are shown to be effective both economically and socially, the Rats are done. For generations.

I'd like to see MM dropped from the tail ramp of a C-130 on a HANO jump over Fallujah. (Yes, HANO.) Wonder what his terminal velocity is?


136 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:08 PM PST by datura (Rabies and lead poisoning combined with advanced syphilis approximates liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Clint N. Suhks (Clever!),

That song is on the "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" soundtrack. I got that CD three years ago, and still have not removed it from my five-disk changer. It's one of the greatest albums ever.


137 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:11 PM PST by newagepublius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian
They (hispanics) need to break 50-50 for it to be a wash, and I hope you're right that we're on our way to that.

The actual numbers go like this: 35% of Hispanics voted for Bush in 2000; 42% in 2004. That's a 7 point increase. If this trend continues, the Republicans will be near your magic number of 50%.

For verification of the positive trend, check out this thread: A major increase in Latino votes for Bush

138 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:33 PM PST by Vision Thing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
"Some pundit said yesterday that he knew the dems would lose as soon as he saw Moore and Jimmy Carter seated together at the dem convention."

During the speech I kept waiting for them to cut to Moore and see Jimmy Carter gone, while Moore licked his fingers...

139 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:45 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks. For some reason, I had forgotten about old Teddy and his Bull Moose. It is odd how many of these close races involved a third party candidate.


140 posted on 11/04/2004 10:10:50 PM PST by prometheus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson