Skip to comments.
Two Nations Under God
NY Times ^
| 11/4/04
| Thomas Friedman
Posted on 11/04/2004 7:44:03 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I often begin writing columns by interviewing myself IT'S ALL ABOUT MEE!!!! See ya in 2006.
2
posted on
11/04/2004 7:45:26 PM PST
by
mabelkitty
(Blackwell for Governor in 2006!!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Well, at least he's not bitter.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I often begin writing columns by interviewing myself.I bet that's not all he does himself.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The MSM seem unaware that when their boy Billy won by 43% and 49% they never, ever talked this way about "division".
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
6
posted on
11/04/2004 7:47:04 PM PST
by
Max Combined
(I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine...)
To: mabelkitty
It is the way in which he and they have used that religious energy to promote divisions and intolerance at home and abroad.The left is just seething over the fact that Christians are allowed to vote.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
8
posted on
11/04/2004 7:48:52 PM PST
by
M-cubed
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"
Is it a country that does not intrude into people's sexual preferences and the marriage unions they want to make? Is it a country that allows a woman to have control over her body? Is it a country where the line between church and state bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers should be inviolate? Is it a country where religion doesn't trump science? And, most important, is it a country whose president mobilizes its deep moral energies to unite us - instead of dividing us from one another and from the world?"
No, no, no and no.
You got that? Now get your whiny liberal ass on that plane to Paris before I get mad.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Actually, just ONE of two nations is "under G-d". The other is careful to keep G-d out.
10
posted on
11/04/2004 7:51:00 PM PST
by
hlmencken3
(Think good and it will be good!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
... we disagree on what America is. He's beginning to catch on.
11
posted on
11/04/2004 7:51:05 PM PST
by
wizardoz
(Au revoir, Jean Kerry!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We can write books about how fringe these Marxists are.
But in the end, it still boils down to one word:
Clueless.
Blue America didn't learn a lesson after 2000. Blue America didn't learn a lesson after 2002. Blue America will not change one thing after 2004. Oh, wait! They will change! Yes, they will seek advice from even more radical extremists from the left so they can be "better prepared" to fight Red America in 2008. Clueless!
12
posted on
11/04/2004 7:52:31 PM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection; lawgirl
What an idiot Thomas Friedman is! Good read.
13
posted on
11/04/2004 7:52:50 PM PST
by
mtngrl@vrwc
( We cannot change the direction of the wind... but we can adjust our sails.)
To: M-cubed
Indeed. When you compare Bush's first term with the 8 years of Bill "Searching for a Legacy" Clinton, this is laughable. President Bush has laid out a challenge for his second term and based on past performance, he'll do what he says.
14
posted on
11/04/2004 7:53:06 PM PST
by
bigbob
(2)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But what troubled me yesterday was my feeling that this election was tipped because of an outpouring of support for George Bush by people who don't just favor different policies than I do - they favor a whole different kind of America. This from the party that constantly sceams "EVERY VOTE MUST BE COUNTED" (as long as it's a RAT vote?)
15
posted on
11/04/2004 7:53:43 PM PST
by
11th_VA
(VRWC Local 1077)
To: Paul Atreides
I bet that's not all he does himself. You had to go there.
To make the mental picture even more disturbing,all the Libs. at the New York Times have one "thing" on their mind now.
16
posted on
11/04/2004 7:54:21 PM PST
by
Redcoat LI
(3.5 Million)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We don't just disagree on what America should be doing; we disagree on what America is.
Finally! It sinks in!
17
posted on
11/04/2004 7:56:02 PM PST
by
so_real
(It's all about sharing the Weather)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Am I in a parallel universe?
18
posted on
11/04/2004 7:56:26 PM PST
by
digger48
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
How much fun would it be to have been hanging out inside the NY Times newsroom the past few days? They're each taking their turns with primal screams.
19
posted on
11/04/2004 7:57:00 PM PST
by
speedy
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Is it a country that does not intrude into people's sexual preferences and the marriage unions they want to make? Is it a country that allows a woman to have control over her body? Is it a country where the line between church and state bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers should be inviolate? Is it a country where religion doesn't trump science? And, most important, is it a country whose president mobilizes its deep moral energies to unite us - instead of dividing us from one another and from the world? The most striking thing about this commentary from a liberal, those folks who claim an understanding of the "complex," is the simplistic, immature, concrete nature of the thinking on display here.
I don't subscribe to or read the NYT, but am astounded at the level of simplistic logic displayed in this piece.
20
posted on
11/04/2004 7:57:12 PM PST
by
PLK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson