The NY Times doesn't believe that people, religious or not, see the President as a competent leader in a difficult time for our country. Instead, they chalk his win up to the fact that Americans are too "unenlightened" to choose someone like John Kerry. According to them, we didn't choose GWB based on intellectual analysis of the issues. We chose him because we are ignorant, "religious nuts".
Is it permissible to say that part of their blindness is that the NYT has embraced all of the elitist doctrine and behavior that is not favored by most Americans, including aggressively flaunted homosexuality, and is blinded by that to the Truth?
As I posted above, Beware the "Uriah Heeps" in the shadows....planning, plotting, ingratiating their way into conservatives' confidence.
They would grab our conservative victory---- and dilute the president's mandate----- for their own self-serving agendas.
They could care less for the rights of the unborn and the rest of the proto-conservative issues that drove millions of Christians to the polls.
The agenda-laden, elliptical thinkers are lurking out there trying to take credit for conservative victories.
It ain't gonna happen.
Any mucking up of our hard-won conservative victory with hidden agendas will be met with fierce resistance.
Moral issues are moral issues are moral issues.