Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Kerry campaign senior strategist Tad Devine has admitted the senator's low point was not answering the swiftboat ads right away.

.
.
.

".... When a group of Swift Boat vets attacked Mr. Kerry's record in August he said nothing for two weeks. Why not swing back immediately? That is not his style." Brinkley maintains Kerry waited until the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post "exposed his critics as liars and frauds."


I don't think Kerry ever "answered the swiftboat ads" right away or otherwise. They did attempt to smear the Swift Vets as "right wing operatives of the Bush campaign", but never provided a refutation of specific allegations.

And, I have yet to see where the NYT, WSJ, WP or anyone else has exposed the Swift Vets as "liars and frauds". In fact, as I remember, it was the Kerry campaign who started backtracking on the first purple heart and Christmas in Cambodia. Had the MSM pursued this story with even a tenth of the vigor in which they dogged the Bush TANG performance, Kerry would have lost by 20 points.
47 posted on 11/04/2004 6:49:44 AM PST by NonLinear ("If not instantaneous, then extrordinarily fast" - Galileo re. speed of light. circa 1600)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonLinear

My opinion (for whatever it may be worth):

The Swiftvets should not spend any more time or money on Kerry right now. The time will come. He will go back into his cave for awhile, but he'll never be able to avoid public scrutiny again the way he has in the past.
Just keep an eye on him, Swifites; eventually the right moment will appear when you can push on the discharge issue again. For now, hold on to the good will you have earned. Play the part of good winners. Kerry will eventually give you a good justification to expose him once and for all.

In the meantime, I'd like to see the Swiftvets organization shift its focus to the lies, distortions, and institutionalized bias of the MainScream Media.

Maybe they could change their name to "Veterans for Truth" (or something like that), and broaden their membership. After all, even conservatives who have never been in the service are in a sense veterans of the "Truth Wars" with the MainScream Media. The more people we have monitoring the media, the better.

The media have taken some good blows this year, but they are still on their same old path. We must maintain a steady pressure on them and slap their hands hard whenever they try any of their customary monkey business.

People in the media (and I once was one) are only human, and will naturally have personal biases. But if they make the effort, they can be objective and fair in their reporting. It's not impossible.

The media used to be more fair than they now are, and they can be that way again. But they won't make the effort unless we keep the pressure on them.

The battlefield has changed now, but the war continues.


51 posted on 11/04/2004 7:54:21 AM PST by Clique (...because I couldn't find a better name that wasn't already taken, that's why :O()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson