The purpose of the intentionaly distorted exit polls was to shore up support for the democrats and disheaten the republicans, as well as set up the basis for court challenges to the real election results. The polls were skewed toward women and to urban areas in order to give a false Kerry lead, in this last dirty trick of the campaign.
If the "rats" were stunned, they only have their usual dirty tricks to blame, not the Internet. But then again "rats" never take responsibility, always blame others, and always accuse others of their own dirty tricks.
Ann also addresses the need to run a conservative in 08 whi is proud to defend marraiage, PBA, etc. No RINO will defeat the hildebeast.
The fact is - and this is crucial for anyone interested in the future of your town or city or state - it's not just exit polls that are dishonest. One can make the case, sort of, that honest polling data presented objectively is useful as an adjunct to sane policy making. Unfortunately, polling of all sorts has been twisted into radical social engineering used to manipulate public perception, isolate or freeze honest and heartfelt dissent for controversial subjects. Radicals take advantage of most people's good nature and willingness to compromise. Polling is bought and paid for by special interest groups in order to gain a predetermined outcome by giving the illusion of public input.