Posted on 11/04/2004 2:33:35 AM PST by kattracks
SHHHHHHHHHHH!!! No, Ann! Don't let them know why they just got pimp-slapped into an electoral coma, this time out! WE WANNA BE ABLE TO USE THEIR SAME "WEAPONS" AGAINST THEM NEXT TIME OUT, FOR PETE'S SAKE -- ! :)
That was a dumbass move. There was no reason for the President to water down his position. The President won and I am very, very glad but I hope these Republicans grow some and start telling the Dems about how things are gonna be. Are you listening Repubs??--We got the power, let's use it.
Keep up the 'healing', Ann !!
BUMP
I'd vote for Rudy but I think many Repubs wouldn't come out to support him--too liberal in the social arena.
Without question I think most of that 6 or 6 1/2% can be attributed to the old media, which did not feel it mattered in the least what Kerry has done since his Vietnam war service days. In that span of years were stories that reporters should have been climbing all over themselves like wild dogs after dead meat. But not a single one of them pursued any of those stories. That in itself was the biggest crime of this whole campaign.
How he managed to conspire to get that deal, that he was hands off to all questions and even reporters that would have asked even semi tough questions shows collusion at the highest levels of the old media. The wool they tried to pull over the American public was worth at LEAST 6 or 6 and 1/2 points and probably much more.
If we want out figure out how a person with complete crap credentials for the job got as far as he did, I think we have to look no further than that. ABCCBSNBCMSNBCCNN and all the crap newspapers are to blame. Even ones that endorsed President Bush were to blame.
My local rag, the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed President Bush because they HAD to, not because they wanted to. In Cincinnati, their customer base is hugely Republican/Conservative. But I canceled my newspaper subscription because like most other newspapers, the articles were at least 60-70% pro-Kerry and negative for Bush. If they thought by endorsing President Bush they would get my business back they were mistaken. They can keep their liberal rag and I'll keep my money.
As usual, she doesn't mince words. And, of course, this isn't a time to mince words. V's wife
Terry McCauliff is a double agent. V's wife
Hmmmm ... I'm going to have to read and learn a bit more about this.
Methinks Ann is on to something here.
Watson ... The game is afoot!
The fact is - and this is crucial for anyone interested in the future of your town or city or state - it's not just exit polls that are dishonest. One can make the case, sort of, that honest polling data presented objectively is useful as an adjunct to sane policy making. Unfortunately, polling of all sorts has been twisted into radical social engineering used to manipulate public perception, isolate or freeze honest and heartfelt dissent for controversial subjects. Radicals take advantage of most people's good nature and willingness to compromise. Polling is bought and paid for by special interest groups in order to gain a predetermined outcome by giving the illusion of public input.
This one is a keeper. It may be the most intelligent assessment of the recent campaign that we will read anywhere.
GOP ticket for 2008.......
ANN COULTER...President
RUDY GUILIANNI.....Vice President
UNBEATABLE!!!!!!!!!!!
Exit polls and crime profiling, just plain wrong.
PING
He did? I must have missed that. I've just lost a lot of respect for him.
Had Ann ran the campaign, JFK would be President-Elect this morning, As usual she has many good points but then she goes off on a tangent.
No need for this piece this morning. Tom close to a success.
VOTER FRAUD... simple... that and 40% of American's are "lost souls".
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.