Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
Does anyone else feel a bit uncomfortable with calling the conservative victory "Red America".

Wasn't this a Dem ploy from 2000? I seem to recall that originally (and briefly) they were coloring Gore states red and Bush states blue, but apparently the media were afraid the "red" would carry the obvious connotations and switched them. Don't recall the details.

8 posted on 11/04/2004 2:27:49 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: maryz

Considering their homosexual inclination the blue color is a correct one.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 2:35:23 AM PST by maksim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: maryz

" ... apparently the media were afraid the "red" would carry the obvious connotations and switched [Democrats to blue]."

My memory is that in 1980 when Reagan swept the country, all his states were shown as blue. This election feels mighty like 1980 otherwise ... thank God.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 2:55:02 AM PST by EDINVA (a FReeper in PJ's beats a CBS anchor in a suit every time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: maryz
In 2000,the MSM said that blue was always used for the incumbent's color and red for the challenger.

I wondered about their explanation back then.

Now,I'm sure in my own mind that it was BS and they're simply afraid of giving "commie red" to the Dims because it would be so fitting and cause more people to see the obvious.

40 posted on 11/04/2004 3:37:01 AM PST by Free Trapper (Terrorism is the Black Heart of Islam,not the fringe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson