I've often wondered if Bush really would block Clinton from taking over the UN. Skirt-chasing aside, he's really not any worse than the people who've been in charge there before. If the whole rest of the world backed Clinton for the job I'm not so sure Bush would block him. What would Bush gain from it? After all, if Bush has done anything it's show that the UN is totally irrelevant to American foreign policy. Bush could OK him and still do anything and everything he wants.
I agree, Clinton certainly can't be any worse than what we already have. Sure, he's be media whoring all over the place, and maybe taking some of the attention from Bush, but at the same time, that could provide Bush some cover from the hostile MSM.
William Clinton as the head of the United Nations would be a complete disaster. I am certain that at every opportunity he would continue to covertly and overtly seek to subjugate our country's best interests for the "greater good" of the world. I would be stunned and more deeply saddened then Daschle, if our president ever allowed a stage hog like Clinton a spot at the table of the corrupt UN (not that he wouldn't, mind you, fit right in).
Who would want to give that pontificating jerk a platform to continue betrayal of his country for the benefit of his "insignificant other?"