To: Dimensio
I would be happy to discuss Krsna and his teachings. Suffice it to say his teachings are a parenthetical cult of Hinduism. Not a great deal of difference. Budhism is also a cult of Hinduism. We have plowed that ground and it only leads to the void. I ask one question only. I am not trying to be tricky. Will you tell me role of the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics as it relates to Origins.
To: Texas Songwriter
I would be happy to discuss Krsna and his teachings. Suffice it to say his teachings are a parenthetical cult of Hinduism. Not a great deal of difference. Funny that! All your cults look the same to us too.
Budhism is also a cult of Hinduism. We have plowed that ground and it only leads to the void.
If you say so...
I ask one question only. I am not trying to be tricky. Will you tell me role of the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics as it relates to Origins.
Perhaps you could try to undumb-it-down a bit and be a bit more specific. And spurious capital letters are not needed.
168 posted on
11/08/2004 1:39:52 PM PST by
balrog666
(Lack of money is the root of all evil.)
To: Texas Songwriter
I would be happy to discuss Krsna and his teachings.
Okay. Why should I believe someone who speaks of Jesus and not someone who speaks of Krsna?
Suffice it to say his teachings are a parenthetical cult of Hinduism.
I'm aware of Krsna and its relation to Hinduism.
Not a great deal of difference.
The study of Krsna is a more specialized field within the study of Hinduism in general.
Budhism is also a cult of Hinduism.
Er, no. Buddhism's early roots are tied to Hinduism, but Buddhism itself is not Hindusim. You'd be able to make a more convincing case for Islam being a "cult" of Judaism.
We have plowed that ground and it only leads to the void.
Huh? What does that mean? How does this relate to my question of why I should believe a Christian over a Vishnuvite?
I ask one question only. I am not trying to be tricky. Will you tell me role of the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics as it relates to Origins.
The Origins of what? The Origins of life, the Origins of the planet, the Origins of the solar system or the Origins of the universe?
I suppose that it doesn't matter. In every case, the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics simply meant that during whatever Origins period you want, there was no loss or gain of energy (though there might have been conversion) and the overall entropy of the universe did not decrease.
169 posted on
11/08/2004 2:06:01 PM PST by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson