Maybe the Senate should reject Spector as too extreme for consideration as Senate Judiciary Chairman. He is pretty much warning the President that he shall be every bit the irresponsible and unreasonable little tyrant, that another recently unseated runt from South Dakota had been in that position, when it came to approving Judicial appointees.
We will never have qualified and outstanding Judges on the Supreme Court, as long as mental midgets such as Daschele and Specter are in a position to block all appointees except those whose only interest in life is continuing the slaughter that Roe vs Wade has caused. Such mind sets are no more rational than a rabid dog.
Why does everyone assume that Sen. Spector is telling the President that he, Senator Spector, is going to block certain appointees? It seems to me that what he is saying is that the Senate as a whole is not going to approve appointees that it views as extremist; at least, as defined by the phone calls, letters, and faxes that it gets from it's constituents, especially those Senators up for re-election in the mid-terms. And that he should consider not only the views of those he would nominate, but what the likelihood is of those nominees actually getting confirmed.