Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zon
It's not an "unfunded mandate". It's funded out of the tax receipts.

So Texas will keep 20% of their NST receipts as a administrative fee to cover the cost of collection, but Massachussets will keep 85% because they have a bigger bureaucracy and need to pay more government salaries. Who will audit them? Who will check that their admin costs are correct? What if they don't pay?

46 posted on 11/03/2004 11:18:53 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's a joke, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
I think it's 1/4 of one percent -- .0025

The bureaucracy required to administer the probate checks and be watchdog over states remitting tax receipts would be less than one percent of what the IRS now costs to fund. And the right to privacy regained is absolutely enormous.

57 posted on 11/03/2004 11:27:20 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls

Which is best? The Feds pounding the citizens or the Feds pounding the states? Which gives the individual more freedom?


237 posted on 11/03/2004 8:02:39 PM PST by CSM (Freepin from home for the first time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson