If a person chooses to collect social security. The purpose of the clause is to ensure that people may retain their social security benefits by paying into social security.You can (mis)read it however you want. It is clear in the language of the bill that wages and self-imployment shall be reported.
It most certainly appears that you want the government to force people to report their incomes to government.I'm not for the FairTax, you are. And the FairTax requires wages and self-imployment to be reported. So who wants the government to force people to report their incomes?
How specifically you are hitching a ride on their coattails -- what your vested interest is -- you have yet to divulge.No interest except I think this is a lousy plan for America. That and I hate the lies and distortions the supporters of the FairTax are using.
You want to violate one or all of those rights by enlisting government agents to initiate force and fraud against innocent people -- myself included.Huh? Climb back into your bunker or I'll sick the black helicopters on you.
You can (mis)read it however you want. It is clear in the language of the bill that wages and self-imployment shall be reported.
As I wrote and you chose to ignore: The Social Security Administration (SSA) retains the regulations for whether a person must report their income to the government. The clause you referenced is subordinate or secondary to SSA regulation.
Also, with the elimination of the IRS there is no bureaucracy to enforce the reporting of income. Nor does HR 25 state that there will be an agency to enforce the reporting of income.
It is wrong for government to force people to pay into social security who would chose not to. The Social Security ponzi scam and the SSA need to be eliminated.