I doubt that it was she who was confused. The book was ghost written and not published until years after she had died. But I raised a couple of points on how she couldn't have had a slave at the time she was supposed to have. I don't suppose you have anything that refutes that, do you?
No you didn't. You jumped to that conclusion, and expected the rest of us to follow you over the cliff.
I don't suppose you have anything that refutes that, do you?
Already posted by bushpilot. It's not my fault that the truth doesn't mesh with the fantasy taught to you by some liberal "teacher." You should be angry about being lied to, not about finally being told the truth.