Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington State Governor's Race tied at 49% - Libertarian candidate taking 2% (!%%!!#^)
Yahoo ^

Posted on 11/03/2004 1:42:42 AM PST by ambrose

Washington State Governor's Race tied at 49% - Libertarian candidate taking 2% (!%%!!#^)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: dinorossi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-282 next last
To: LibertarianInExile

There you go again, mistaking me for a "dumbass" member of your family. You might want to have that checked out. Given that and your losertarian leanings, your conditions might still be treatable.


181 posted on 11/03/2004 3:14:12 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

These votes typically come in with vast majorities. Paul's position is a protest statement.


182 posted on 11/03/2004 3:14:18 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I don't consider voting not to support our troops a protest.


183 posted on 11/03/2004 3:14:56 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Well you know, the various Congressbeings don't get to each propose a spending bill of their own, and then they average it all out. If they did, then we could see exactly what Ron Paul wanted. Rather a bill gets put up and it's a yes or no vote. If Paul really thinks the spending bill is too much, how else can he express that sentiment?


184 posted on 11/03/2004 3:17:49 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"If Paul really thinks the spending bill is too much, how else can he express that sentiment?"

Not by spitting on the troops who are defending this nation.

185 posted on 11/03/2004 3:18:38 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

How has Paul "spat" on them?


186 posted on 11/03/2004 3:19:44 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: All
The title from another thread: "Bin Laden warns of retaliation"

I guess bin Laden must be an LP'er.

187 posted on 11/03/2004 3:20:06 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

What LP'er ever advocated beheading women who do not dress from head to toe in veils?


188 posted on 11/03/2004 3:21:11 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Hmmmmm? Siding with Baghdad Jim McDermott on every vote opposing the war and on providing the troops with the necessary material to stay alive?


189 posted on 11/03/2004 3:21:39 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

A bill "opposing the war" has never gone before either house of Congress, because it has never gotten out of committee.


190 posted on 11/03/2004 3:46:00 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

A "no" vote is opposition...at least in the real world.


191 posted on 11/03/2004 3:47:52 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

It is symbolic only. Many congressional votes are symbolic.


192 posted on 11/03/2004 3:52:24 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"It is symbolic only. Many congressional votes are symbolic."

Yes, he only SYMBOLICLY spit on our troops.

193 posted on 11/03/2004 3:53:58 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

All the "no" means is that he doesn't agree with the bill as written.


194 posted on 11/03/2004 3:57:26 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Such as voting no to provide the funds necessary to give the troops the equipment necessary to prosecute the war and protect themselves? Hardly. "No" means you do not support our troops or care about protecting them during a time of war.

Of course he could take his case directly to the troops. I'm sure they would only symbolicly express their appreciation.

195 posted on 11/03/2004 3:59:32 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

The bill stated a specific dollar amount. It did not write a blank check. A blank check bill would be unconstitutional.


196 posted on 11/03/2004 4:05:49 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Tell that to the troops he didn't want to support. His voting record has been consistent...and known. It's time the Texas GOP did something to Paul. Perhaps they should adopt the LP's own tactics...and teach Paul a lesson LP style.

Time to start writing e-mails.

197 posted on 11/03/2004 4:08:37 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

You are changing the subject.


198 posted on 11/03/2004 4:17:27 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Not at all...you folks brought up St. Paul as an example...of a libertarian, pretend Republican, who consistently votes against the war and our troops.

It's time St. Paul be taught a lesson...LP style. Don't worry, it only hurts a little while...isn't that what you people say?

199 posted on 11/03/2004 4:20:14 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

If you can compete with him. But you are so full of pork you can't.


200 posted on 11/03/2004 4:21:10 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson